These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
329 related items for PubMed ID: 7839959
1. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion and metabolism: feasibility of registering gated MR and PET images. Sinha S, Sinha U, Czernin J, Porenta G, Schelbert HR. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 7839959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement in the quantification of myocardial perfusion using an automatic spline-based registration algorithm. Dornier C, Ivancevic MK, Thévenaz P, Vallée JP. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 12884327 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Model-based analysis of electrocardiography-gated cardiac (18)F-FDG PET images to assess left ventricular geometry and contractile function. Khorsand A, Graf S, Frank H, Kletter K, Sochor H, Maurer G, Schuster E, Globits S, Dudczak R, Porenta G. J Nucl Med; 2003 Nov; 44(11):1741-6. PubMed ID: 14602854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI-assisted dual motion correction for myocardial perfusion defect detection in PET imaging. Wang X, Rahmim A, Tang J. Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4536-4547. PubMed ID: 28646593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Examination of myocardial perfusion with positron emission tomography: a clinically useful and valid method?]. vom Dahl J. Herz; 1997 Feb; 22(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 9173038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of registration of PET, SPECT and MR images of a brain phantom. Turkington TG, Jaszczak RJ, Pelizzari CA, Harris CC, MacFall JR, Hoffman JM, Coleman RE. J Nucl Med; 1993 Sep; 34(9):1587-94. PubMed ID: 8355080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]