These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 7846721

  • 1. [A finely dispersed copper alloy for amalgams--a prospective filling material in pediatric dentistry. II. Clinical research].
    Pobochina VV, Chuev VP.
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1994; 73(3):62-5. PubMed ID: 7846721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [A clinical evaluation of an improved copper amalgam].
    Pobochina VV.
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1991; (6):23-5. PubMed ID: 1803643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [The working conditions of medical personnel handling the SMTA brand copper amalgam].
    Chuev VP, Pobochina VV, Chechina GN.
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1994; 73(3):65-8. PubMed ID: 7846722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [A finely dispersed copper alloy for amalgams. 1. The physical studies].
    Chuev VP, Em VG, Pobochina VV.
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1993; 72(4):69-73. PubMed ID: 8108832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ, Wahab FK, Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Fleming GJ, Marquis PM.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a two year period.
    van der Merwe WJ.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1992 Dec; 47(12):521-5. PubMed ID: 9511639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Criteria for choice of an alloy for dental amalgams].
    De Valkeneer I, Bercy P.
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990 Jun; 44(170):219-36. PubMed ID: 2088017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials.
    Letzel H, van 't Hof MA, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ.
    J Dent Res; 1997 Nov; 76(11):1787-98. PubMed ID: 9372797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a three year period.
    van der Merwe WJ.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jun; 48(6):329-32. PubMed ID: 9511601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry.
    Fuks AB.
    Pediatr Dent; 2002 Jun; 24(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 12412959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Effectiveness of the amalgam filling in treating caries of the deciduous teeth].
    Poppe B, Zühlke S, Symizek S.
    Stomatol DDR; 1981 Mar; 31(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 6942550
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Barr-Agholme M, Odén A, Dahllöf G, Modeér T.
    Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 1814768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [A comparative evaluation of the technological characteristics of working with metal-containing filling materials in the clinic].
    Iankevich OV.
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1997 Oct; 76(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 9471804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Copper amalgam in pedodontics].
    Faadal M.
    Fasett; 1973 Dec; 8(3-4):39-40, 32. PubMed ID: 4283542
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T.
    Swed Dent J; 1983 Dec; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of high-copper amalgams.
    Berry TG, Osborne JS, Summitt JB.
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):122-4. PubMed ID: 8599586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
    Dutta BN, Gauba K, Tewari A, Chawla HS.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R, Voss A.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990 Sep; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW, Richardson AS.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists.
    Pair RL, Udin RD, Tanbonliong T.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 Mar; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.