These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

272 related items for PubMed ID: 7852749

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Long term effect of nifedipine GITS and lisinopril on subclinical organ damage in patients with essential hypertension.
    Pontremoli R, Viazzi F, Ravera M, Leoncini G, Berruti V, Bezante GP, Del Sette M, Deferrari G.
    J Nephrol; 2001; 14(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 11281339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Lisinopril versus slow release nifedipine in patients with essential hypertension: a multicentre study.
    Predel HG, Kramer HJ.
    J Hum Hypertens; 1994 Oct; 8(10):777-80. PubMed ID: 7837215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Lisinopril and enalapril in hypertension: a comparative study using ambulatory monitoring.
    Conway J, Coats AJ, Bird R.
    J Hum Hypertens; 1990 Jun; 4(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 2163450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Different effects of nifedipine and amlodipine on circulating catecholamine levels in essential hypertensive patients.
    de Champlain J, Karas M, Nguyen P, Cartier P, Wistaff R, Toal CB, Nadeau R, Larochelle P.
    J Hypertens; 1998 Nov; 16(11):1357-69. PubMed ID: 9856375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.
    Palatini P, Dorigatti F, Mugellini A, Spagnuolo V, Varì N, Ferrara R, Bertocchi F.
    Clin Ther; 2004 Sep; 26(9):1436-45. PubMed ID: 15531006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Comparative antihypertensive action of 20 mg delayed-action nifedipine with either 25 or 50 mg atenolol. A study on the treatment of patients with mild to moderately severe arterial hypertension].
    Kraft K, Schiessl S, Vetter H.
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1996 Sep 03; 85(36):1081-6. PubMed ID: 8927880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Ambulatory monitoring of arterial pressure in the treatment of mild-moderate arterial hypertension with lisinopril vs. enalapril].
    Motero Carrasco J.
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1997 Sep 03; 67(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 9221708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.