These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

210 related items for PubMed ID: 7853282

  • 1. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P, Edmonds P.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
    Smith-Levitin M, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P.
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A, Cuzick J, Singer A.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Oct; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B, Gearhart J, Evers CG, Cason Z, Replogle WH.
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M, Fertitta L, Goldbaum B, Hamza M, Vanerian S, Isenstein L.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE.
    Acta Cytol; 1986 Aug; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
    Selvaggi SM, Malviya V.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1991 Aug; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
    Ferenczy A, Robitaille J, Guralnick M, Shatz R.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
    Noel ML.
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989 Apr; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Apr; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G, Schlaerth JB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
    Longatto Filho A, Maeda MY, Santos DR, de Andréa Filho A, Cavaliere MJ, Shih LW, Oyafuso MS.
    Rev Paul Med; 1991 Aug; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Boon ME.
    Acta Cytol; 1988 Aug; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Simultaneous sampling of the endocervix and ectocervix using the profile brush.
    Longfield JC, Grimshaw RN, Monaghan JM.
    Acta Cytol; 1993 Aug; 37(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 8328241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M, Nieberg RK, Mulcahy D, Wiesmeier E.
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Oct; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
    Ivanov S.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007 Oct; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.