These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 786897

  • 21. Influence of variation in contact stress on the sliding-wear behaviour of a dental amalgam.
    Rice SL, Wayne SF, Bailey WF, Roto M.
    Biomaterials; 1981 Jan; 2(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7236832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Surface changes on dental materials. The influence of two different dentifrices on surface roughness measured by laser reflexion and profilometer techniques.
    Johannsen G, Redmalm G, Rydén H.
    Swed Dent J; 1989 Jan; 13(6):267-76. PubMed ID: 2603131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing.
    Shortall AC, Hu XQ, Marquis PM.
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 11823017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].
    Meier C, Lutz F.
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar; 89(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 293032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The effect of water on the abrasion of restorative materials.
    Heath JR, Wilson HJ.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1977 Apr; 4(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 266053
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Wear resistance of isosit and polymethyl methacrylate occlusal splint material.
    Schulte JK, Anderson GC, Sakaguchi RL, DeLong R.
    Dent Mater; 1987 Apr; 3(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 3481583
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The effect of microabrasion on restorative materials and tooth surface.
    Chan DC, Lemke KC, Howell ML, Barghi N.
    Oper Dent; 1996 Apr; 21(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 8957920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel.
    Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 23328193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Indirect restorations for severe tooth wear: fracture risk and layer thickness.
    Hamburger JT, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MC.
    J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 24120523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [The abrasion of deciduous dental enamel and dental restorative materials].
    Wada M.
    Shigaku; 1984 Apr; 71(6):1063-82. PubMed ID: 6591081
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro.
    Heintze SD, Forjanic M.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Apr; 30(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 16268397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.