These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

225 related items for PubMed ID: 7879763

  • 21. Recording condylar movement with two facebow systems.
    Hicks ST, Wood DP.
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 8863965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Relationship between orthodontic treatment, condylar position, and internal derangement in the temporomandibular joint.
    Artun J, Hollender LG, Truelove EL.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jan; 101(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 1731488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
    Wen-Ching Ko E, Huang CS, Lo LJ, Chen YR.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Mandibular condyle position: comparison of articulator mountings and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Alexander SR, Moore RN, DuBois LM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 8362784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Is There "A Best" Centric Relation Record? Centric Relation Records, Condyle Positions, and Their Practical Significance.
    Utz KH, Lückerath W, Schwarting P, Noethlichs W, Büttner R, Grüner M, Fuß E, Stark H.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep; 36(3):262–272. PubMed ID: 36484682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effect of modified and conventional facemask therapy on condylar position in Class III patients.
    Yagci A, Uysal T.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Nov; 13(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 21040468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. An appraisal of the literature on centric relation. Part III.
    Keshvad A, Winstanley RB.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jan; 28(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 11298910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK, Goyal S.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Jan; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Hyoid bone position and orientation in Class I and Class III malocclusions.
    Adamidis IP, Spyropoulos MN.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Apr; 101(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 1558059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements.
    Shildkraut M, Wood DP, Hunter WS.
    Angle Orthod; 1994 Apr; 64(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 7794320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparison of condylar position in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent facial skeletal types.
    Girardot RA.
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Aug; 71(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 11510632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Neuromuscular diagnosis in orthodontics: effects of TENS on the sagittal maxillo-mandibular relationship.
    Monaco A, Cattaneo R, Spadaro A, Marzo G.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Dec; 9(4):163-9. PubMed ID: 19072003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Reproducibility of the centric relation bite registration technique.
    Wood DP, Elliott RW.
    Angle Orthod; 1994 Dec; 64(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 8060017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [The centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy in adult angle's class II pretreatment patients].
    Deng X, Wan Z, He SS, Wamalwa P, Chen S, Zhang ZY.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 29(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 21427900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Anterior condylar displacement: its diagnosis and treatment.
    Weinberg LA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Aug; 34(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 1097657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Cephalometric analysis: comparisons between maximum intercuspation and centric relation.
    Williamson EH, Caves SA, Edenfield RJ, Morse PK.
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 281875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.
    Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 19651349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The Overbite Complexity: How The Vertical Position, Tooth-Size Ratios And Other Factors Affect Occlusion and Overbites.
    Loudon ME, Nguyen TV.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015 Aug; 26(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 26349293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Reproduction ofarticulator settings and movements with an ultrasonic jaw movement recorder.
    Baker PJ, Setchell DJ, Tredwin CJ.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16808105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
    Bernhardt O, Küppers N, Rosin M, Meyer G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.