These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

192 related items for PubMed ID: 791532

  • 21. [Evaluation of the methods used for the serologic diagnosis of brucellosis].
    Sirmatel F, Türker M, Bozkurt AI.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2002 Apr; 36(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 12652868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Comparative study of the Brucellacapt test versus the Coombs test for Brucella].
    Gómez MC, Rosa C, Geijo P, Escribano MA.
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1999 Apr; 17(6):283-5. PubMed ID: 10439538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Comparison of a new and rapid method, Brucella Coombs gel test with the other methods in the serological diagnosis of brucellosis].
    İrvem A, Yücel FM, Aksaray S, Bor E.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 26167818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Counterimmunoelectrophoresis in the diagnosis of infectious epididymitis in rams].
    Ivanov P, Vitkov M.
    Vet Med Nauki; 1982 Apr; 19(5):40-4. PubMed ID: 6891140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. A comparison of three serological tests in the diagnosis of caprine brucellosis.
    Falade S.
    Res Vet Sci; 1978 May; 24(3):376-7. PubMed ID: 97740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Comparison of the Wright, indirect Coombs and enzyme immunoassay IgG methods for the diagnosis of chronic brucellosis].
    Colak H, Usluer G, Ozgüneş I, Karagüven B, Barlas S.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 1992 Jan; 26(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 1574021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Comparison of the results from commercially available Brucella ELISA test kits for the investigation of bovine sera].
    Staak C, Draeger A, Bahn P, Dorn C, Ortmann G.
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1997 Jun; 110(6):206-10. PubMed ID: 9290043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Application of a user-friendly Brucella-specific IgM and IgG antibody assay for the rapid confirmation of Rose Bengal-positive patients in a hospital in Iran.
    Roushan MR, Amin MJ, Abdoel TH, Smits HL.
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2005 Oct; 99(10):744-50. PubMed ID: 16095642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evaluation of a rapid, reliable, and inexpensive screening test for the serological diagnosis of human brucellosis.
    Altwegg M, Bohl E.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1985 Aug; 260(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 4060922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.