These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
196 related items for PubMed ID: 7932793
1. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. Zharkikh A. J Mol Evol; 1994 Sep; 39(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 7932793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of phylogeny using a general Markov model. Jayaswal V, Jermiin LS, Robinson J. Evol Bioinform Online; 2007 Feb 25; 1():62-80. PubMed ID: 19325854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Unbiased estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences. Tajima F. Mol Biol Evol; 1993 May 25; 10(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 8336549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. Yang Z. J Mol Evol; 1994 Jul 25; 39(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 8064867 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. DISTREE: a tool for estimating genetic distances between aligned DNA sequences. Schäfer J, Schöniger M. Comput Appl Biosci; 1997 Aug 25; 13(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 9283760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of methods for estimating the transition:transversion ratio from DNA sequences. Kristina Strandberg AK, Salter LA. Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Aug 25; 32(2):495-503. PubMed ID: 15223032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards optimal distance functions for stochastic substitution models. Gronau I, Moran S, Yavneh I. J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep 21; 260(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 19501101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of methods for estimating the nucleotide substitution matrix. Oscamou M, McDonald D, Yap VB, Huttley GA, Lladser ME, Knight R. BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec 01; 9():511. PubMed ID: 19046431 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tests of applicability of several substitution models for DNA sequence data. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Jan 01; 12(1):131-51. PubMed ID: 7877488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fixation probabilities for the Moran process in evolutionary games with two strategies: graph shapes and large population asymptotics. de Souza EP, Ferreira EM, Neves AGM. J Math Biol; 2019 Mar 01; 78(4):1033-1065. PubMed ID: 30357453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data. Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y. J Mol Evol; 1983 Mar 01; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation and extension of Markov process models for the evolution of DNA]. Yang Z, Goldman N. Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1994 Mar 01; 21(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 8003346 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Phylogenetic distances for neighbour dependent substitution processes. Falconnet M. Math Biosci; 2010 Apr 01; 224(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 20064534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Rodríguez F, Oliver JL, Marín A, Medina JR. J Theor Biol; 1990 Feb 22; 142(4):485-501. PubMed ID: 2338834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An evolution model for sequence length based on residue insertion-deletion independent of substitution: an application to the GC content in bacterial genomes. Lèbre S, Michel CJ. Bull Math Biol; 2012 Aug 22; 74(8):1764-88. PubMed ID: 22644340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stochastic traits of molecular evolution--acceptance of point mutations in native actin genes. Schöniger M, Hofacker GL, Borstnik B. J Theor Biol; 1990 Apr 05; 143(3):287-306. PubMed ID: 2385107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]