These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 7933268

  • 21. Four-year randomized prospective comparison of percutaneous ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft versus prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.
    McQuade K, Gable D, Pearl G, Theune B, Black S.
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 52(3):584-90; discussion 590-1, 591.e1-591.e7. PubMed ID: 20598480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Patency in canine inferior vena cava grafting: effects of graft material, size, and endothelial seeding.
    Herring M, Gardner A, Peigh P, Madison D, Baughman S, Brown J, Glover J.
    J Vasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 1(6):877-87. PubMed ID: 6208388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Klinkert P, Schepers A, Burger DH, van Bockel JH, Breslau PJ.
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jan; 37(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 12514593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Prospective, randomized comparison of ringed and nonringed polytetrafluoroethylene femoropopliteal bypass grafts: a preliminary report.
    Gupta SK, Veith FJ, Kram HB, Wengerter KR.
    J Vasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 13(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 1987388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparison of precuffed and vein-cuffed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for infragenicular arterial reconstructions: a case-matched study.
    Oderich GS, Panneton JM, Yagubyan M, Bower TC, Hofer J, Noel AA, Sullivan T, Kalra M, Cherry KJ, Gloviczki P.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2005 Jan; 19(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 15714367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Midterm results of autologous saphenous vein and ePTFE pre-cuffed bypass surgery in peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Donker JM, Ho GH, Te Slaa A, de Groot HG, van der Waal JC, Veen EJ, van der Laan L.
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2011 Oct; 45(7):598-603. PubMed ID: 21757494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Reoperation for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass failure: the importance of distal outflow site and operative technique in determining outcome.
    Ascer E, Collier P, Gupta SK, Veith FJ.
    J Vasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 5(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 3820403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Evaluation of electrostatically endothelial cell seeded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in a canine femoral artery model.
    Fields C, Cassano A, Makhoul RG, Allen C, Sims R, Bulgrin J, Meyer A, Bowlin GL, Rittgers SE.
    J Biomater Appl; 2002 Oct; 17(2):135-52. PubMed ID: 12557999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Polytetrafluoroethylene versus human umbilical vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass: six-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Aalders GJ, van Vroonhoven TJ.
    J Vasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 16(6):816-23; discussion 823-4. PubMed ID: 1460707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Is the preferential use of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for femoropopliteal bypass justified?
    Quiñones-Baldrich WJ, Busuttil RW, Baker JD, Vescera CL, Ahn SS, Machleder HI, Moore WS.
    J Vasc Surg; 1988 Sep; 8(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 3418827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass.
    Gabrielli R, Ciocca F, Dante A, Musilli A, Maiorano M, Ventura M.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 52():316.e15-316.e19. PubMed ID: 29886210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparative evaluation of prosthetic, reversed, and in situ vein bypass grafts in distal popliteal and tibial-peroneal revascularization. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group 141.
    Arch Surg; 1988 Apr; 123(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3348735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.