These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Quantitative comparison of motor unit potential parameters between monopolar and concentric needles. Chan RC, Hsu TC. Muscle Nerve; 1991 Oct; 14(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 1944402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of motor unit firing rates by standard concentric needle electromyography. Gunreben G, Schulte-Mattler W. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Mar; 32(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 1313354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential. Barkhaus PE, Periquet MI, Nandedkar SD. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 46(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 16929630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB, Stålberg EV, Andreassen S. Muscle Nerve; 1988 Feb; 11(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 3343991 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the size principle be detected in conventional EMG recordings? Ertas M, Stålberg E, Falck B. Muscle Nerve; 1995 Apr; 18(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 7715629 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface detected potentials of normal and reinnervated motor units: a simulation study for muscles consisted of short fibres. Dimitrova NA, Disselhorst-Klug C, Trachterna A, Dimitrov GV, Rau G. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 42(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 12056337 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The spectrum of concentric macro EMG correlations. Part I. Normal subjects. Bauermeister W, Jabre JF. Muscle Nerve; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1406764 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods for estimating numbers of motor units in biceps-brachialis muscles and losses of motor units with aging. Brown WF, Strong MJ, Snow R. Muscle Nerve; 1988 May; 11(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 3374514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the interimpulse interval on the propagation velocity of the motor unit potentials. Kossev A, Gerasimenko Y, Gantchev N, Christova P. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 May; 31(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 2009822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Selectivity of spatial filters for surface EMG detection from the tibialis anterior muscle. Farina D, Arendt-Nielsen L, Merletti R, Indino B, Graven-Nielsen T. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 12669992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of MUAP properties in array surface EMG recordings of the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscle. Kallenberg LA, Preece S, Nester C, Hermens HJ. J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Dec; 19(6):e536-42. PubMed ID: 19138534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials. Wee AS, Ashley RA. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Dec; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating motor unit discharge patterns from high-density surface electromyogram. Holobar A, Farina D, Gazzoni M, Merletti R, Zazula D. Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):551-62. PubMed ID: 19208498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Topographical characteristics of motor units of the lower facial musculature revealed by means of high-density surface EMG. Lapatki BG, Oostenveld R, Van Dijk JP, Jonas IE, Zwarts MJ, Stegeman DF. J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 95(1):342-54. PubMed ID: 16000526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The spectrum of concentric macro EMG correlations. Part II. Patients with diseases of muscle and nerve. Gan R, Jabre JF. Muscle Nerve; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1085-8. PubMed ID: 1406765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials. Ferdjallah M, Wertsch JJ, Harris GF. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Oct; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]