These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

441 related items for PubMed ID: 7943073

  • 1. Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia.
    Santolaya-Forgas J, Meyer WJ, Gauthier DW, Kahn D.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1072-5. PubMed ID: 7943073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
    Rotmensch S, Celentano C, Liberati M, Malinger G, Sadan O, Bellati U, Glezerman M.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight.
    Hedriana HL, Moore TR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1600-4; discussion 1604-6. PubMed ID: 8203416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ultrasonographic detection of abnormal fetal growth with the gestational age-independent, transverse cerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference ratio.
    Meyer WJ, Gauthier D, Ramakrishnan V, Sipos J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1057-63. PubMed ID: 7943070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus].
    Mitkowska-Woźniak H, Brazert J, Wender-Ozegowska E, Meissner W, Persona-Sliwińska A, Pietryga M, Biczysko R.
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 Nov; 74(11):1444-9. PubMed ID: 15029733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
    Loetworawanit R, Chittacharoen A, Sututvoravut S.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S60-4. PubMed ID: 17726811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS, Robischon K, Cox C.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Wright D, Wright A, Smith E, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 31682299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.
    Sokol RJ, Chik L, Dombrowski MP, Zador IE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1489-95. PubMed ID: 10871470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Abnormal growth patterns in diabetes in pregnancy: a longitudinal study.
    Langer O, Kozlowski S, Brustman L.
    Isr J Med Sci; 1991 Jun; 27(8-9):516-23. PubMed ID: 1960050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Danon D, Hadar E, Gabbay-Benziv R.
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Estimating Gestational Age With Sonography: Regression-Derived Formula Versus the Fetal Biometric Average.
    Cawyer CR, Anderson SB, Szychowski JM, Neely C, Owen J.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Mar; 37(3):677-681. PubMed ID: 28967674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester.
    Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Nardelli C, Pinto LR, Selvaggi LE.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 18307214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness.
    Petrikovsky BM, Oleschuk C, Lesser M, Gelertner N, Gross B.
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1997 Sep; 25(7):378-82. PubMed ID: 9282803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Macrosomia in postdates pregnancies: the accuracy of routine ultrasonographic screening.
    Pollack RN, Hauer-Pollack G, Divon MY.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 167(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1442959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA, Smits LJ, Oosterbaan HP, Nijhuis JG.
    J Perinat Med; 2008 Jul; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Charts for fetal age assessment based on fetal sonographic biometry in a population from Cali, Colombia.
    Briceño F, Restrepo H, Paredes R, Cifuentes R.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2135-43. PubMed ID: 24277896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
    Dubiel M, Krajewski M, Pietryga M, Tretyn A, Breborowicz G, Lindquist P, Gudmundsson S.
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa, Jehan AH, Chowdhury SB, Sultana F, Haque JA, Khatun S, Karim MA.
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Predicting neonatal weight of more than 4000 g using fetal abdominal circumference measurement by ultrasound at 38-40 weeks of pregnancy: a study in Iran.
    Dadkhah F, Kashanian M, Bonyad Z, Larijani T.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 22690747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.