These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 7943076

  • 1. Double-blind comparison of intracervical and intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Hales KA, Rayburn WF, Turnbull GL, Christensen HD, Patatanian E.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1087-91. PubMed ID: 7943076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Local administration of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labor induction: the appropriate route and dose.
    Nuutila M, Kajanoja P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Feb; 75(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8604599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pre-induction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 gel: intracervical versus intravaginal route.
    Zanini A, Ghidini A, Norchi S, Beretta E, Cortinovis I, Bottino S.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):681-3. PubMed ID: 2216204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a critical analysis.
    Rayburn WF.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 160(3):529-34. PubMed ID: 2648830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cervical ripening before induction of labor: a randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel versus low-dose oxytocin.
    Jackson GM, Sharp HT, Varner MW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1092-6. PubMed ID: 7943077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Ripening of the uterine cervix and induction of labour at term with prostaglandin E2 in viscous gel.
    Wingerup L, Andersson KE, Ulmsten U.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1978 Oct; 57(5):403-6. PubMed ID: 364917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized prospective comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravaginal and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel.
    Stempel JE, Prins RP, Dean S.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1305-9; discussion 1309-12. PubMed ID: 9215189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Ripening of the unfavorable cervix with prostaglandin E2: intracervical versus intravaginal route.
    Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 Jan; 76 Suppl 1():63-8. PubMed ID: 8113660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Myometrial activity after local application of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and term labor induction.
    Granström L, Ekman G, Ulmsten U.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 162(3):691-4. PubMed ID: 2316570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Induction of labor by prostaglandin E(2) in relation to the Bishop score.
    Kemp B, Winkler M, Rath W.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Oct; 71(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11044536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Double-blind comparison of 2.5 and 5.0 mg of prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Smith CV, Miller A, Livezey GT.
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):745-8. PubMed ID: 8913976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cervical ripening and labor outcome with preinduction intracervical prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil) gel.
    Nager CW, Key TC, Moore TR.
    J Perinatol; 1987 Oct; 7(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 3504454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2 intravaginal gel versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening before induction of labor.
    Pollnow DM, Broekhuizen FF.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 174(6):1910-3; discussion 1913-6. PubMed ID: 8678158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Sciscione AC, McCullough H, Manley JS, Shlossman PA, Pollock M, Colmorgen GH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 180(1 Pt 1):55-60. PubMed ID: 9914578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison.
    Chuck FJ, Huffaker BJ.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 7485307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and labour induction: a multicentre placebo-controlled trial.
    Bernstein P.
    CMAJ; 1991 Nov 15; 145(10):1249-54. PubMed ID: 1933707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pre-induction intracervical application of a highly viscous prostaglandin E2 gel in pregnant women with an unripe uterine cervix: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
    Troostwijk AL, van Veen JB, Doesburg WH.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Jan 31; 43(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 1563557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and cervical prostaglandin gel for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Irion O, Pedrazzoli J, Mermillod B.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan 31; 91(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 9464723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.