These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

225 related items for PubMed ID: 7949682

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
    Low RN, Sigeti JS.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
    Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, Winston JS, Edge SB, Arredondo MA, Mazurchuk RV, Blumenson LE.
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN, Francis IR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions.
    Boné B, Péntek Z, Perbeck L, Veress B.
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):489-96. PubMed ID: 9240665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of conventional and gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced fat-suppressed MR imaging.
    Okizuka H, Sugimura K, Yoshizako T, Kaji Y, Wada A.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Jul; 6(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 8724412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine?
    Müller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhäuser K, Sand J, Stoll P, Claussen CD.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997 Jul; 7(1):236-40. PubMed ID: 9039622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [MR mammography of fatty tissue necrosis].
    Kurtz B, Achten C, Audretsch W, Rezai M, Zocholl G.
    Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 8963048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.