These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 7957652

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-Multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study.
    Bock NC, Santo C, Pancherz H.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 19194675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis.
    Nedeljković N, Cubrilo D, Hadzi-Mihailović M.
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Binda SK, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Maertens JK, van 't Hof MA.
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 7957655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reaction of facial soft tissues to treatment with a Herbst appliance.
    Meyer-Marcotty P, Kochel J, Richter U, Richter F, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Apr; 73(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 22391787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.
    Hourfar J, Lisson JA, Gross U, Frye L, Kinzinger GSM.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):971-980. PubMed ID: 28721528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.
    Hansen K.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992 Mar; 88():1-49. PubMed ID: 1492308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Oct; 76(4):423-42. PubMed ID: 291343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 10371429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
    de Almeida MR, Flores-Mir C, Brandão AG, de Almeida RR, de Almeida-Pedrin RR.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF, Oliveira AG.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Perception of changes in soft-tissue profile after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Rego MV, Martinez EF, Coelho RM, Leal LM, Thiesen G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):559-564. PubMed ID: 28257740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 16644850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study.
    Hansen K, Pancherz H, Hägg U.
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec; 13(6):471-81. PubMed ID: 1817073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A, Uysal T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 21357655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L, Martin C, Tremont T, Gunel E, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Facial soft tissue changes in adolescent patients treated with three different functional appliances: a randomized clinical trial.
    Brandão NMCB, Palomares NB, Lima T, Quintão CCA, Lopes KB, Miguel JAM.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2024 Nov; 29(5):e242440. PubMed ID: 39383371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the mandibular incisor segment: a cephalometric and biometric investigation.
    Hansen K, Koutsonas TG, Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 9228847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.