These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The stability of facial advancement surgery (in the management of combined mid and lower dento-facial deficiency). Hoffman GR, Moloney FB, Effeney DJ. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1994 Apr; 22(2):86-94. PubMed ID: 8021324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The stability of facial osteotomies. 4. Maxillary and mandibular (with or without chin) advancement with rigid internal fixation. Hoffman GR, Moloney FB. Aust Dent J; 1995 Dec; 40(6):365-71. PubMed ID: 8615741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal and dento-alveolar stability of Le Fort I intrusion osteotomies and bimaxillary osteotomies in anterior open bite deformities. A retrospective three-centre study. Hoppenreijs TJ, Freihofer HP, Stoelinga PJ, Tuinzing DB, van't Hof MA, van der Linden FP, Nottet SJ. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Jun; 26(3):161-75. PubMed ID: 9180224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion. de Lir Ade L, de Moura WL, Oliveira Ruellas AC, Gomes Souza MM, Nojima LI. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 23196069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback. Donatsky O, Bjørn-Jørgensen J, Holmqvist-Larsen M, Hillerup S. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Oct; 55(10):1071-9; discussion 1079-80. PubMed ID: 9331229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. Ko EW, Hsu SS, Hsieh HY, Wang YC, Huang CS, Chen YR. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1469-77. PubMed ID: 21256648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of orthognathic surgery on velopharyngeal function by evaluating speech and cephalometric radiographs. Impieri D, Tønseth KA, Hide Ø, Brinck EL, Høgevold HE, Filip C. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Dec; 71(12):1786-1795. PubMed ID: 30172730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft tissue outcome after mandibular advancement--an anthropometric evaluation of 171 consecutive patients. Raschke GF, Rieger UM, Bader RD, Guentsch A, Schaefer O, Schultze-Mosgau S. Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1415-23. PubMed ID: 22893037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in Class III treatment. de Lira Ade L, de Moura WL, de Barros Vieira JM, Nojima MG, Nojima LI. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):e290-7. PubMed ID: 22449434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment. Baker BW, Woods MG. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001 Apr; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of minimal versus conventional presurgical orthodontics in skeletal class III patients treated with two-jaw surgery. Joh B, Bayome M, Park JH, Park JU, Kim Y, Kook YA. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1733-41. PubMed ID: 23932114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]