These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

235 related items for PubMed ID: 7963020

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
    Saoji AA, Litvak L, Spahr AJ, Eddins DA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X, Fu QJ, Wei CG, Cao KL.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):957-70. PubMed ID: 18818548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ.
    Neuroreport; 2002 Sep 16; 13(13):1635-9. PubMed ID: 12352617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC, Poroy O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep 16; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM, Debruyne JA, Chenault MN, Francart T, Brokx JP.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Sep 16; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients.
    Pelizzone M, Boëx C, Montandon P.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993 Sep 16; 55(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 8265119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ, Danhauer JL, Edgerton BJ.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun 16; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Optimizing cochlear implant speech performance.
    Skinner MW.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2003 Sep 16; 191():4-13. PubMed ID: 14533838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ, Oba S, Başkent D, Fu QJ.
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun 16; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.