These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP. Stroke; 2000 Mar; 31(3):615-21. PubMed ID: 10700494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trial. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Staikov IN, Arnold M, Mattle HP, Remonda L, Sturzenegger M, Baumgartner RW, Schroth G. J Neurol; 2000 Sep; 247(9):681-6. PubMed ID: 11081806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial? Gagne PJ, Matchett J, MacFarland D, Hauer-Jensen M, Barone GW, Eidt JF, Barnes RW. J Vasc Surg; 1996 Sep; 24(3):449-55; discussion 455-6. PubMed ID: 8808967 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reanalysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Rothwell PM, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, European Carotid Surgery Trialist's Collaboration. Stroke; 2003 Feb; 34(2):514-23. PubMed ID: 12574569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability in measurement of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis as displayed by both digital subtraction and magnetic resonance angiography: an assessment of three caliper techniques and visual impression of stenosis. Young GR, Humphrey PR, Nixon TE, Smith ET. Stroke; 1996 Mar; 27(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 8610315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Carotid stenosis by digital subtraction angiography: reproducibility of the European Carotid Surgery Trial and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement methods and visual interpretation. Vanninen R, Manninen H, Koivisto K, Tulla H, Partanen K, Puranen M. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Oct; 15(9):1635-41. PubMed ID: 7847206 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Carotid stenosis measurement on colour Doppler ultrasound: agreement of ECST, NASCET and CCA methods applied to ultrasound with intra-arterial angiographic stenosis measurement. Wardlaw JM, Lewis S. Eur J Radiol; 2005 Nov; 56(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15964165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography. De Marco JK, Nesbit GM, Wesbey GE, Richardson D. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of DSA in carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between stenosis measured on carotid endarterectomy specimens and DSA in 644 cases. Svoboda N, Bradac O, Mandys V, Netuka D, Benes V. Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Dec; 164(12):3197-3202. PubMed ID: 35945355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]