These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

214 related items for PubMed ID: 7978521

  • 21. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH, Sellke TA, BeGole EA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The effectiveness and long-term stability of overbite correction with incisor intrusion mechanics.
    Al-Buraiki H, Sadowsky C, Schneider B.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 15643414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Treatment effects of bonded spurs associated with high-pull chincup therapy in the treatment of patients with anterior open bite.
    Cassis MA, de Almeida RR, Janson G, de Almeida-Pedrin RR, de Almeida MR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 22999672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.
    Neves LS, Janson G, Cançado RH, de Lima KJ, Fernandes TM, Henriques JF.
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Oct; 15(1):54. PubMed ID: 25182030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT, Ucuncü N, Yüksel S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions.
    Hering K, Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 10515146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A retrospective cephalometric evaluation of dental changes with activator and activator headgear combination in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Lall R, Kumar GA, Maheshwari A, Kumar M.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan 01; 12(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22186684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype.
    Sankey WL, Buschang PH, English J, Owen AH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep 01; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
    Strahm C, De Sousa AP, Grobéty D, Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug 01; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV, McNamara JA, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar 01; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb 01; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun 01; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR, Dolce C, McGorray SP, Le H, King GJ, Wheeler TT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul 01; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR, Lima DV, Freitas KM, Janson G, Henriques JF.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct 01; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR, Henriques JF, Almeida RR, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Ursi W.
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb 01; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Caldwell SF, Hymas TA, Timm TA.
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May 01; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Cephalometric changes during headgear-reactivator treatment.
    Remmelink HJ, Tan BG.
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec 01; 13(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 1817072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study.
    Cura N, Sarac M, Oztürk Y, Sürmeli N.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jul 01; 110(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 8686676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A cephalometric evaluation of anterior openbite correction with the magnetic active vertical corrector.
    Barbre RE, Sinclair PM.
    Angle Orthod; 1991 Jul 01; 61(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 2064077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal changes during treatment with the Bionator type 1.
    Carels C, Reychler A, van der Linden FP.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov 01; 24(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 9426166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.