These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


226 related items for PubMed ID: 7982240

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Why? What next? And so what?
    Baines CJ.
    Cancer; 1995 Nov 15; 76(10 Suppl):2107-12. PubMed ID: 8635008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Richardson JL, Mondrus GT, Danley K, Deapen D, Mack T.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan 15; 5(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8770470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mammographic screening of women aged 40 to 49 years. Is it justified?
    Feig SA.
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1994 Dec 15; 21(4):587-606. PubMed ID: 7731636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties.
    Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen HH, Holmqvist M, Yen MF, Abdsalah S, Epstein B, Frodis E, Ljungberg E, Hedborg-Melander C, Sundbom A, Tholin M, Wiege M, Akerlund A, Wu HM, Tung TS, Chiu YH, Chiu CP, Huang CC, Smith RA, Rosén M, Stenbeck M, Holmberg L.
    Cancer; 2002 Aug 01; 95(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 12209737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Screening mammography controversies: resolved, partly resolved, and unresolved.
    Feig SA.
    Breast J; 2005 Aug 01; 11 Suppl 1():S3-6. PubMed ID: 15725113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates.
    Cox B.
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Aug 01; 17(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 18562953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Is routine mammography screening appropriate for women 40-49 years of age?
    Miller AB.
    Am J Prev Med; 1991 Aug 01; 7(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 1867901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL, Draisma G, der Kinderen A, Brown ML, de Koning HJ.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep 17; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Breast cancer screening: recent trends in the use of mammography in Nebraska.
    Rettig B, Nelson N, Faulk R.
    Nebr Med J; 1994 May 17; 79(5):136-8; discussion 139. PubMed ID: 8047188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The control of breast cancer through mammography screening. What is the evidence?
    Tabár L, Dean PB.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep 17; 25(5):993-1005. PubMed ID: 3306777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Implementation of breast cancer screening.
    Pisano ED, McLelland R.
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug 17; 3(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 1909543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.