These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 7990038

  • 1. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Eakle WS, Staninec M, Yip RL, Chavez MA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 7990038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Karezis A.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The adhesive amalgam--fact or fiction?
    Temple-Smithson PE, Causton BE, Marshall KF.
    Br Dent J; 1992 Apr 25; 172(8):316-9. PubMed ID: 1591117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Apr 25; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microleakage and SEM interfacial micromorphology of amalgam restorations using three adhesive systems.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Dent; 2000 Aug 25; 28(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 10856807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM, Moore BK, Rhodes B, Swartz M.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct 25; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bonding characteristics of a phosphonated anaerobic adhesive to amalgam.
    Watts DC, Devlin H, Fletcher JE.
    J Dent; 1992 Aug 25; 20(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 1430516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of two resin adhesives on mechanical properties of set amalgam.
    Millstein PL, Naguib GH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul 25; 74(1):106-9. PubMed ID: 7674180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bonding amalgam to dentin by different methods.
    Hadavi F, Hey JH, Strasdin RB, McMeekin GP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Sep 25; 72(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 7965897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.
    Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML.
    Oper Dent; 1992 Sep 25; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.