These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

324 related items for PubMed ID: 7991772

  • 1. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
    Mason PN, Ferrari M.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ.
    Oper Dent; 1992 Jul; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999 Jul; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS.
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D, De Siebenthal G, Neveu-Rosenstand L, Holz J.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S, Mante MO, Mante FK.
    J Clin Dent; 1996 Oct; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Adhesion of liners to dentin. In vivo experiments].
    Mason PN.
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Feb 28; 58(3):38-44, 47-9. PubMed ID: 2397830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Feb 28; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 28; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations.
    Ferrari M, Davidson CL.
    Oper Dent; 1996 Feb 28; 21(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8957921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Davidson CL, Abdalla AI.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb 28; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies.
    Aboushala A, Kugel G, Hurley E.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996 Feb 28; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Marginal leakage of composite resin and glass ionomer].
    Kfouri Lopes Mda G, Stroparo FM, Beltrami E, Stroparo CM, Segala AD.
    Dens (Curitiba); 1989 Feb 28; 5(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 2490127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE.
    Oper Dent; 1995 Feb 28; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Trushkowsky RD, Gwinnett AJ.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun 28; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Júnior S, Ritter AV.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct 28; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Burgersdijk RC.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug 28; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS, Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Williams CE.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994 Aug 28; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N, Ozata F, Sepetcioglu F.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997 Aug 28; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of incremental versus bulk fill techniques on the microleakage of composite resin using a glass-ionomer liner.
    Puckett A, Fitchie J, Hembree J, Smith J.
    Oper Dent; 1992 Aug 28; 17(5):186-91. PubMed ID: 1289865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.