These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

248 related items for PubMed ID: 7993947

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Non-invasive Doppler-derived cardiac output: a validation study comparing this technique with thermodilution and Fick methods.
    Davies JN, Allen DR, Chant AD.
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1991 Oct; 5(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 1959678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Real-time gas-exchange measurement of oxygen consumption in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery.
    Chang AC, Kulik TJ, Hickey PR, Wessel DL.
    Crit Care Med; 1993 Sep; 21(9):1369-75. PubMed ID: 8370302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation.
    Spahn DR, Schmid ER, Tornic M, Jenni R, von Segesser L, Turina M, Baetscher A.
    J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Feb; 4(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 2131856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of cardiac output measurement techniques: thermodilution, Doppler, CO2-rebreathing and the direct Fick method.
    Espersen K, Jensen EW, Rosenborg D, Thomsen JK, Eliasen K, Olsen NV, Kanstrup IL.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1995 Feb; 39(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 7793193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Continual trending of Fick variables in the critically ill patient.
    Quinn TJ, Weissman C, Kemper M.
    Chest; 1991 Mar; 99(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 1899824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
    Engoren M, Barbee D.
    Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed-Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement.
    Hardin EA, Stoller D, Lawley J, Howden EJ, Hieda M, Pawelczyk J, Jarvis S, Prisk K, Sarma S, Levine BD.
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Sep; 9(17):e015794. PubMed ID: 32851906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Continuous measurement of cardiac output by the Fick principle in infants and children: comparison with the thermodilution method.
    Wippermann CF, Huth RG, Schmidt FX, Thul J, Betancor M, Schranz D.
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 May; 22(5):467-71. PubMed ID: 8796404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.