These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

146 related items for PubMed ID: 7995689

  • 21. [Development of modern classification systems and their effects on forensic psychiatric expert assessment].
    Krupinski M.
    Gesundheitswesen; 1994 Dec; 56(12):652-6. PubMed ID: 7841673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. An investigation of competency to participate in legal proceedings in Canada.
    Whittemore KE, Ogloff JR, Roesch R.
    Can J Psychiatry; 1997 Oct; 42(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 9356777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Personality disorders and criminal responsibility: a second opinion.
    Rudnick A, Levy A.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994 Oct; 17(4):409-20. PubMed ID: 7890474
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ, Gottfried ED, Batastini AB.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. An investigation of the ECST-R in male pretrial patients: evaluating the effects of feigning on competency evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ, Rogers R, Gabel J.
    Assessment; 2009 Sep; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 19779096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Glezer D, Chabannes JM.
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
    Konrad N, Völlm B.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014 Jun; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
    Dolan B.
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004 Jun; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Is expert psychiatric testimony fundamentally immoral?
    Mossman D.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994 Jun; 17(4):347-68. PubMed ID: 7890470
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Reliability, validity and utility of the Fitness Interview Test.
    McDonald DA, Nussbaum DS, Bagby RM.
    Can J Psychiatry; 1991 Sep; 36(7):480-4. PubMed ID: 1933756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Changes to the Criminal Code provisions for mentally disordered offenders and their implications for Canadian psychiatry.
    Davis S.
    Can J Psychiatry; 1993 Mar; 38(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 8467438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI, Rosenfeld B, Fitch WL.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994 Mar; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994 Mar; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. AAPL Practice Resource for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial.
    Wall BW, Ash P, Keram E, Pinals DA, Thompson CR.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Sep; 46(3 Supplement):S4-S79. PubMed ID: 30602602
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Prediction of competency to stand trial: contribution of demographics, type of offense, clinical characteristics, and psycholegal ability.
    Nicholson RA, Johnson WG.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1991 Sep; 14(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 1864694
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Defendant's or convict's competency to stand trial - forensic psychiatric evaluation.
    Cynkier PN.
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017 Sep; 67(3):214-225. PubMed ID: 29460611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Mentally ill and non-mentally ill defendants' abilities to understand information relevant to adjudication: a preliminary study.
    Hoge SK, Poythress N, Bonnie R, Eisenberg M, Monahan J, Feucht-Haviar T, Oberlander L.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996 Sep; 24(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 8807159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.