These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 8008611

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Kaiser DA, Rux HW, Dutton FB.
    Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond.
    Imbery TA, Hilton TJ, Reagan SE.
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Robbins JW, Burgess JO, Summitt JB.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mechanical resistance of extensive amalgam "restorations" anchored with the aid of threaded pins and amalgapins.
    Zangirolami NT, Steagall L, dos Santos Júnior J.
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989 Apr; 3(1):289-93. PubMed ID: 2638492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Apr; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Proximal Contact Repair of Complex Amalgam Restorations.
    Zguri MN, Casey JA, Jessup JP, Vandewalle KS.
    Oper Dent; 2017 Apr; 42(3):266-272. PubMed ID: 28080293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF, Larsen RB.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Apr; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ, Shaglouf AG, Combe EC, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Apr; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations.
    Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Batzer RC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY, Davis RD, Overton JD.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Jun; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Modification of the resistance form of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations.
    Kane JJ, Burgess JO.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Apr; 65(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 2066880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.