These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1686 related items for PubMed ID: 8010208

  • 21. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging.
    Seki H, Azumi R, Kimura M, Sakai K.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1579-85. PubMed ID: 9168730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with percutaneous ethanol injection: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Bartolozzi C, Lencioni R, Caramella D, Mazzeo S, Ciancia EM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):827-31. PubMed ID: 8141000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN, Francis IR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Improved contrast of enhancing brain lesions using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging.
    Melhem ER, Guidone PL, Jara H, Yucel EK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):1091-5. PubMed ID: 9124121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo and two-dimensional spin-echo sequences.
    Barentsz JO, Jager G, Mugler JP, Oosterhof G, Peters H, van Erning LT, Ruijs SH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7998522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck.
    Wu X, Raz E, Block TK, Geppert C, Hagiwara M, Bruno MT, Fatterpekar GM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 25247956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Orbit, skull base, and pharynx: contrast-enhanced fat suppression MR imaging.
    Barakos JA, Dillon WP, Chew WM.
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 2006277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences.
    Czerny C, Rand T, Gstoettner W, Woelfl G, Imhof H, Trattnig S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
    Coulam CH, Chan FP, Li KC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN, Barone RM, Lacey C, Sigeti JS, Alzate GD, Sebrechts CP.
    Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 9240546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: comparison of fat-suppressed and conventional T1-weighted images.
    Mirowitz SA, Shady KL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):385-9. PubMed ID: 1632362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas: T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced FLASH MR imaging.
    Guthrie JA, Ward J, Robinson PJ.
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 8888221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging.
    Low RN, Francis IR, Sigeti JS, Foo TK.
    Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 8430191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper part of the abdomen: should fat suppression be used routinely?
    Lu DS, Saini S, Hahn PF, Goldberg M, Lee MJ, Weissleder R, Gerard B, Halpern E, Cats A.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1095-100. PubMed ID: 8165989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Fat-suppression MR imaging in neuroradiology: techniques and clinical application.
    Tien RD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):369-79. PubMed ID: 1729800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Islet cell tumors: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression.
    Semelka RC, Cumming MJ, Shoenut JP, Magro CM, Yaffe CS, Kroeker MA, Greenberg HM.
    Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):799-802. PubMed ID: 8381551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
    Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W, Knopp MV, Schaeffer U, Brix G, Essig M, Hoffmann U, Zuna I, Schönberg S, van Kaick G.
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Improved detection and delineation of head and neck lesions with fat suppression spin-echo MR imaging.
    Tien RD, Hesselink JR, Chu PK, Szumowski J.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991 Nov; 12(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 1846994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness.
    Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Scarfone G, Colombo E, Bolis G, Ferrari A, DelMaschio A.
    Radiology; 1993 Sep; 188(3):797-801. PubMed ID: 8351350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Usefulness of optimized gadolinium-enhanced fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging in revealing lesions of the brain.
    Melhem ER, Bert RJ, Walker RE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):803-7. PubMed ID: 9725320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 85.