These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 8010246

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of unenhanced MR imaging vs contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen or pelvis.
    Lessler DS, Sullivan SD, Stergachis A.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 8010246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB, Dye J, Duval JF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Decision analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of low-osmolality contrast medium for intravenous urography.
    Calvo MV, Pilar del Val M, Mar Alvarez M, Domínguez-Gil A.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 Mar; 49(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 1598930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Incorporating patient-centered outcomes in the analysis of cost-effectiveness: imaging strategies for renovascular hypertension.
    Carlos RC, Axelrod DA, Ellis JH, Abrahamse PH, Fendrick AM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1653-61. PubMed ID: 14627591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Adrenal mass evaluation in patients with lung carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Remer EM, Obuchowski N, Ellis JD, Rice TW, Adelstein DJ, Baker ME.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Apr; 174(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 10749246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols.
    Engellau L, Albrechtsson U, Höjgård S, Norgren L, Larsson EM.
    Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR, Gopalan R, Davidoff AJ, Litt M, Graziano S, Brinker JA.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb 13; 326(7):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
    Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct 13; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Effects of biphasic spiral CT, conventional and iron oxide enhanced MRI on therapy and therapy costs in patients with focal liver lesions].
    Helmberger T, Gregor M, Holzknecht N, Rau H, Scheidler J, Reiser M.
    Rofo; 2000 Mar 13; 172(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 10778456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Decision and cost analysis in acoustic neuroma diagnosis.
    Bance ML, Hyde ML, Malizia K.
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Apr 13; 23(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 8028068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Diagnostic imaging costs: are they driving up the costs of hospital care?
    Beinfeld MT, Gazelle GS.
    Radiology; 2005 Jun 13; 235(3):934-9. PubMed ID: 15833988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. MR imaging of the breast. Imaging and tissue characterization without intravenous contrast.
    Santyr GE.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov 13; 2(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 7489316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography.
    Soto JA, Alvarez O, Múnera F, Velez SM, Valencia J, Ramírez N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct 13; 175(4):1127-34. PubMed ID: 11000177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.