These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

238 related items for PubMed ID: 8015703

  • 1. [The use of Rossavik's mathematical model in determining individual intrauterine growth curves. Our experience].
    Biagiotti R, Brizzi L, Cariati E, Puliga AS, Nannini R.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Mar; 46(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 8015703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
    Konje JC, Abrams KR, Bell SC, Taylor DJ.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prenatal prediction of neonatal growth status in twins using individualized growth assessment.
    Deter RL, Xu B, Milner LL.
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 Feb; 24(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 8621807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15-40 weeks of gestation.
    Schwärzler P, Bland JM, Holden D, Campbell S, Ville Y.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 14970994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A simplified method for determining individual growth curve standards.
    Deter RL, Rossavik IK.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):801-6. PubMed ID: 3658291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reference charts of foetal biometry in Asians.
    Lai FM, Yeo GS.
    Singapore Med J; 1995 Dec; 36(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 8781636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Individual growth curve standards in triplets: prediction of third-trimester growth and birth characteristics.
    Hata T, Deter RL, Hill RM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):379-84. PubMed ID: 1876369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA, Smits LJ, Oosterbaan HP, Nijhuis JG.
    J Perinat Med; 2008 Sep; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods.
    Ariyuki Y, Hata T, Kitao M.
    Pediatrics; 1995 Jul; 96(1 Pt 1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7596719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters.
    Verburg BO, Mulder PG, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW, Witteman JC, Steegers EA.
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Apr; 28(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 18324617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Study of accuracy of commonly used fetal parameters for estimation of gestational age.
    Karki DB, Sharmqa UK, Rauniyar RK.
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006 Apr; 45(162):233-7. PubMed ID: 17189967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Longitudinal fetal biometry of normal pregnant Melanesian Papua New Guineans to construct standards of reference for Papua New Guinea.
    Amoa AB, Wapi J, Klufio CA.
    P N G Med J; 1993 Sep; 36(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 8059548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fetal growth and the etiology of preterm delivery.
    Hediger ML, Scholl TO, Schall JI, Miller LW, Fischer RL.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 7824227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.
    Neufeld LM, Wagatsuma Y, Hussain R, Begum M, Frongillo EA.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19504627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI, Lee YH, Moon MH, Song MJ, Min JY, Kim JA, Park JH, Yang JH, Kim MY, Chung JH, Cho JY, Kim KG.
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Estimating birth weight in twins. Comparison of eight sonographic models.
    Chauhan SP, Cowan BD, Brost BD, Washburne JF, Magann EF, Morrison JC.
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jun; 41(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 8799915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The sonographic assessment of twin growth discordancy.
    Hill LM, Guzick D, Chenevey P, Boyles D, Nedzesky P.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):501-4. PubMed ID: 8090383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Using Z-scores to compare biometry data obtained during prenatal ultrasound screening by midwives and physicians.
    Capmas P, Salomon LJ, Picone O, Fuchs F, Frydman R, Senat MV.
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Jan; 30(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19960449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Dorion A, Ville Y.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12858306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fetal biometry charts for normal pregnant women in northeastern Thailand.
    Saksiriwuttho P, Ratanasiri T, Komwilaisak R.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Oct; 90(10):1963-9. PubMed ID: 18041409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.