These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


165 related items for PubMed ID: 8020525

  • 1. Iomeprol versus iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of thoracic and abdominal organs.
    Valentini AL, Tartaglione T, Monti L, Marano P.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S88-92. PubMed ID: 8020525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Peripheral arteriography with a new nonionic agent: comparison of iomeprol with iopamidol.
    Ugolotti U, Larini P, Marcato C, Cusmano F, Puccianti F.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S77-82. PubMed ID: 8020523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography.
    Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S93-6. PubMed ID: 8020526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison.
    Fattori R, Piva R, Schicchi F, Pancrazi A, Gabrielli G, Marzocchi A, Piovaccari G, Blandini A, Magnani B.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 8020520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A prospective randomised controlled trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iomeprol 350 (Iomeron) in cardiac catheterisation.
    Vijayalakshmi K, Kunadian B, Wright RA, Hall JA, Stewart MJ, Davies A, Sutton A, de Belder MA.
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 17101256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Enhancement and safety of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing abdominal multidetector CT.
    Romano L, Grazioli L, Bonomo L, Xu JR, Chen KM, Dore R, Vanzulli A, Catalano C.
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 82(975):204-11. PubMed ID: 19064592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of the radiographic efficacy of iomeprol.
    Kozuka T, Katayama H, Ebata K.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S109-14. PubMed ID: 8020512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The ACTIVE Trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography.
    Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Erley CM, Grazioli L, Bonomo L, Ni Z, Romano L, Investigators in the Abdominal Computed Tomography: IOMERON 400 Versus VISIPAQUE 320 Enhancement (ACTIVE) Study.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Mar; 43(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 18301313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography.
    Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A.
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):712-5. PubMed ID: 7640924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spiral CT of the mediastinum: optimization of contrast medium use.
    Storto ML, Ciccotosto C, Patea RL, Spinazzi A, Bonomo L.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S83-7. PubMed ID: 8020524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Iomeprol: current and future profile of a radiocontrast agent.
    Katayama H, Spinazzi A, Fouillet X, Kirchin MA, Taroni P, Davies A.
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Feb; 36(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 11224756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of the contrast density of iomeprol.
    Schmiedel E.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S97-103. PubMed ID: 8020527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical experience with iomeprol in myelography and myelo-CT: clinical pharmacology and double-blind comparisons with iopamidol, iohexol, and iotrolan.
    Katayama H, Heneine N, van Gessel R, Taroni P, Spinazzi A.
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Jan; 36(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11176258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical utility and safety profile of iomeprol.
    Rosati G.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S120-4. PubMed ID: 8020514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Four-detector row computed tomographic angiography in the evaluation of infrarenal aorta and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: influence of contrast medium concentration.
    Iezzi R, Cotroneo AR, Filippone A, Giancristofaro D, Storto ML.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008 May; 32(5):690-6. PubMed ID: 18830096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection.
    Schmid I, Didier D, Pfammatter T, Garachemani A, Fleisch M, Kirchin MA, Meier B.
    Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jun 12; 118(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 17376548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of patient comfort between iodixanol and iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis: a randomized trial.
    Weiland FL, Marti-Bonmati L, Lim L, Becker HC.
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul 12; 55(6):715-24. PubMed ID: 24060817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.