These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
143 related items for PubMed ID: 8020526
1. A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography. Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A. Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S93-6. PubMed ID: 8020526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography. Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A. Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):712-5. PubMed ID: 7640924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography. Newhouse JH, Landman J, Lang E, Amis ES, Goldman S, Khazan R, Leder R, Hedgcock M. Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 8071049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A double-blind study comparing the efficiency, tolerance and renal effects of iopromide and iopamidol. Kennedy C, Rickards D, Lee S, Sharp MB, Dawson P. Br J Radiol; 1988 Apr; 61(724):288-93. PubMed ID: 3285943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the radiographic efficacy of iomeprol. Kozuka T, Katayama H, Ebata K. Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S109-14. PubMed ID: 8020512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ioversol in intravenous excretory urography. Evaluation of radiographic quality, patient tolerance and safety in four clinical studies. Jahn H, Müller-Späth R. Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992 May; 35(4 Pt 2):297-302. PubMed ID: 1296496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison. Fattori R, Piva R, Schicchi F, Pancrazi A, Gabrielli G, Marzocchi A, Piovaccari G, Blandini A, Magnani B. Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 8020520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography. Faykus MH, Cope C, Athanasoulis C, Druy EM, Hedgcock M, Miller FJ, Bron K. Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A double-blind comparison of iopromide and iopamidol in intravenous urography. Renwick IG, Fowler RC. Clin Radiol; 1990 Jun; 41(6):405-7. PubMed ID: 2200632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 300 in lower limb angiography. Stockx L, Wilms G, Baert AL, Terrier F. Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996 Jun; 400():72-4. PubMed ID: 8619357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the contrast density of iomeprol. Schmiedel E. Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S97-103. PubMed ID: 8020527 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 64-Slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and abdominal arteries: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 350 mgI/ml versus iomeprol 400 mgI/ml in a prospective, randomised, double-blind multi-centre trial. Loewe C, Becker CR, Berletti R, Cametti CA, Caudron J, Coudyzer W, De Mey J, Favat M, Heautot JF, Heye S, Hittinger M, Larralde A, Lestrat JP, Marangoni R, Nieboer K, Reimer P, Schwarz M, Schernthaner M, Lammer J. Eur Radiol; 2010 Mar; 20(3):572-83. PubMed ID: 19789884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]