These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


152 related items for PubMed ID: 8020841

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Histopathologic adequacy of office endometrial biopsies taken with the Z-sampler and Novak curette in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
    Larson DM, Broste SK.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 8040848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of late luteal phase endometrial biopsies using the Novak curette or PIPELLE endometrial suction curette.
    Hill GA, Herbert CM, Parker RA, Wentz AC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):443-5. PubMed ID: 2915869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma.
    Leitao MM, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Gattoc LP, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 19167049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Incidence of endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia or FIGO stage IA carcinoma diagnosed on endometrial biopsy or endometrial resection].
    Ploteau S, Squifflet JL, Berlière M, Marbaix E, Donnez J.
    Bull Cancer; 2008 May; 95(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 18541521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Kevorkian curette. An appraisal of its effectiveness in endometrial evaluation.
    Ferenczy A, Shore M, Guralnick M, Gelfand MM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Aug; 54(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 460766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments.
    Silver MM, Miles P, Rosa C.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):828-30. PubMed ID: 1923207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A prospective evaluation of an endometrial suction curette.
    Nolan TE, Smith RP, Smith MT, Gallup DC.
    J Gynecol Surg; 1992 Nov; 8(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10148372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
    Del Priore G, Williams R, Harbatkin CB, Wan LS, Mittal K, Yang GC.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 May; 46(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 11396369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of endometrial aspiration biopsy techniques: specimen adequacy.
    Sierecki AR, Gudipudi DK, Montemarano N, Del Priore G.
    J Reprod Med; 2008 Oct; 53(10):760-4. PubMed ID: 19004401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Endometrial biopsy using a plastic curette (Mi-Mark).
    Ansari AH, Essien JD, Hoffman D, Ansari VM.
    Int J Fertil; 1981 Oct; 26(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 6113208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cytologic diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma using the Endo-pap sampler.
    Palermo VG, Blythe JG, Kaufman RH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 3969241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling.
    Williams AR, Brechin S, Porter AJ, Warner P, Critchley HO.
    BJOG; 2008 Jul; 115(8):1028-36. PubMed ID: 18651884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of the Pipelle endometrial suction curette for timed endometrial biopsies.
    Check JH, Chase JS, Nowroozi K, Wu CH, Chern R.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Mar; 34(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 2724236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.