These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparison of late luteal phase endometrial biopsies using the Novak curette or PIPELLE endometrial suction curette. Hill GA, Herbert CM, Parker RA, Wentz AC. Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):443-5. PubMed ID: 2915869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Leitao MM, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Gattoc LP, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR. Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 19167049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Incidence of endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia or FIGO stage IA carcinoma diagnosed on endometrial biopsy or endometrial resection]. Ploteau S, Squifflet JL, Berlière M, Marbaix E, Donnez J. Bull Cancer; 2008 May; 95(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 18541521 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Kevorkian curette. An appraisal of its effectiveness in endometrial evaluation. Ferenczy A, Shore M, Guralnick M, Gelfand MM. Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Aug; 54(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 460766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments. Silver MM, Miles P, Rosa C. Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):828-30. PubMed ID: 1923207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]