These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

99 related items for PubMed ID: 8028804

  • 1. The mean performance regression, a method of objective surgical peer review.
    Millili JJ.
    N J Med; 1994 Mar; 91(3):167-9. PubMed ID: 8028804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Linking processes and outcomes to improve surgical performance: a new approach to morbidity and mortality peer review.
    Pine M, Fry DE.
    Am Surg; 2006 Nov; 72(11):1115-9; discussion 1126-48. PubMed ID: 17120958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An eight-year analysis of surgical morbidity and mortality: data and solutions.
    Goldfarb MA, Baker T.
    Am Surg; 2006 Nov; 72(11):1070-81; discussion 1126-48. PubMed ID: 17120950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery.
    Ho V, Heslin MJ, Yun H, Howard L.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 16614875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mapping changes in surgical mortality over 9 years by peer review audit.
    Thompson AM, Ashraf Z, Burton H, Stonebridge PA.
    Br J Surg; 2005 Nov; 92(11):1449-52. PubMed ID: 15997442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Inpatient surgery in California: 1990-2000.
    Liu JH, Etzioni DA, O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Hiyama DT, Ko CY.
    Arch Surg; 2003 Oct; 138(10):1106-11; discussion 1111-2. PubMed ID: 14557128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Socioeconomic status and surgical mortality in the elderly.
    Birkmeyer NJ, Gu N, Baser O, Morris AM, Birkmeyer JD.
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9):893-9. PubMed ID: 18725842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
    Hall BL, Hirbe M, Waterman B, Boslaugh S, Dunagan WC.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Time-of-day effects on surgical outcomes in the private sector: a retrospective cohort study.
    Kelz RR, Tran TT, Hosokawa P, Henderson W, Paulson EC, Spitz F, Hamilton BH, Hall BL.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Oct; 209(4):434-445.e2. PubMed ID: 19801316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Long-term effect of a Medical Emergency Team on mortality in a teaching hospital.
    Jones D, Opdam H, Egi M, Goldsmith D, Bates S, Gutteridge G, Kattula A, Bellomo R.
    Resuscitation; 2007 Aug; 74(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 17367913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A report card system using error profile analysis and concurrent morbidity and mortality review: surgical outcome analysis, part II.
    Antonacci AC, Lam S, Lavarias V, Homel P, Eavey RA.
    J Surg Res; 2009 May 01; 153(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 18511079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. VA studies patient outcomes and best practices in surgery.
    OR Manager; 1998 Mar 01; 14(3):1, 29-30. PubMed ID: 10177901
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.