These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 8035690

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks.
    Jordon TR.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):512-30. PubMed ID: 7790831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Geometric and semantic similarity in visual masking.
    Jacobson JZ, Rhinelander G.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 May; 4(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 660097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Feature similarity and laterality effects in visual masking.
    Hellige JB.
    Neuropsychologia; 1983 May; 21(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 6664482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Word length and visual-noise texture in backward masking.
    Zamansky HS, Corwin TR.
    Perception; 1976 May; 5(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 951170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of texture on visual noise masking.
    Corwin TR, Zamansky HS.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 830184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition.
    Hatta T.
    Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. What's in a mask? Information masking with forward and backward visual masks.
    Davis C, Kim J.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1990-2002. PubMed ID: 21790494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Figural relationship effects and mechanisms of visual masking.
    Hellige JB, Walsh DA, Lawrence VW, Prasse M.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Feb; 5(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 528933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.
    Solman RT.
    Perception; 1987 Feb; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Perception and masking of wholes and parts.
    McClelland JL.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 May; 4(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 660096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dichoptic backward masking of letters, words, and trigrams in old and young subjects.
    Cramer G, Kietzman ML, van Laer J.
    Exp Aging Res; 1982 May; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 7128655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Does meaning matter? The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking.
    Fine EM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 78(11):831-8. PubMed ID: 11763257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Backward contralateral masking by light and by random pattern.
    Jarvis B, Vormbrock J, Saccuzzo DP.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Aug; 57(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 6622151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The word superiority effect overcomes crowding.
    Cutler J, Bodet A, Rivest J, Cavanagh P.
    Vision Res; 2024 Sep; 222():108436. PubMed ID: 38820621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.