These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

371 related items for PubMed ID: 8040719

  • 1. Glass ionomer restoratives.
    Berry EA.
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1993; 72(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 8040719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK.
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Glass ionomers in the restoration of root surface caries, Class 5 caries and Class 5 erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Marshall TD.
    Tex Dent J; 1990 Mar; 107(3):23-8. PubMed ID: 2368016
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I, Harris EF, Mincer HH, Gilpatrick RO.
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
    Yap AU, Lim CC, Neo JC.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Brackett MG.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Nov; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
    Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Gregory PN, Owens BM.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of four adhesive materials in the treatment of cervical lesions.
    Negri P.
    Minerva Stomatol; 1999 Jun; 48(6 Suppl 1):65-71. PubMed ID: 10549220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.