These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
195 related items for PubMed ID: 8041524
1. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques. Germain M, Heaton R, Erickson D, Henry M, Nash J, O'Connor D. Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women. Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW. Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears. Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G, Schlaerth JB. Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy. Rivlin ME, Woodliff JM, Bowlin RB, Moore JL, Martin RW, Grossman JH, Morrison JC. J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears. Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG. Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells. Cannon JM, Blythe JG. Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling. Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M. Acta Cytol; 1991 Oct; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation. Risberg B, Andersson A, Zetterberg C, Nordin B. J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage? Weitzman GA, Korhonen MO, Reeves KO, Irwin JF, Carter TS, Kaufman RH. J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush. Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R. CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix. Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Essed GG. Acta Cytol; 1991 Feb 01; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]