These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

227 related items for PubMed ID: 8041536

  • 1. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK, Dorchester W.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 8041536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with non-reassuring non-stress test.
    Figueras F, Martínez JM, Puerto B, Coll O, Cararach V, Vanrell JA.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12666219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fetal assessment based on the fetal biophysical profile score: relationship of last BPS result to subsequent cerebral palsy.
    Manning FA, Bondagji N, Harman CR, Casiro O, Menticoglou S, Morrison I.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997 Mar; 26(7):720-9. PubMed ID: 9436057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Predictive value of the nonreactive nonstress test in evaluating neonatal outcome.
    Bhide A, Bhattacharya MS.
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Apr; 36(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 2097363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Papas C, Sofatzis I, Montgomery JT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Low amniotic fluid index as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Voxman EG, Tran S, Wing DA.
    J Perinatol; 2002 Jun; 22(4):282-5. PubMed ID: 12032790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD, Walla CA, Paul RH, Trujillo ME, Loesser CV, Jacobs ND, Broussard PM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov 15; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.