These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 8042937

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM, Plomp R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of varying the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences for hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Festen JM, Plomp R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):621-8. PubMed ID: 2768675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH, Cates WB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Aug; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech recognition in background noise: monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients.
    Persson P, Harder H, Arlinger S, Magnuson B.
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Sep; 22(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 11568669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
    Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2430-41. PubMed ID: 7714260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.