These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

209 related items for PubMed ID: 8043265

  • 1. English and Hebrew letter report by English- and Hebrew-reading subjects: evidence for stimulus control, not hemispheric asymmetry.
    Lubow RE, Tsal Y, Mirkin A, Mazliah G.
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 8043265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR, Patching GR.
    Neuropsychologia; 2004 May; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reading direction and attention: effects on lateralized ignoring.
    Eviatar Z.
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Nov; 29(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 8573329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Language status and hemispheric involvement in reading: evidence from trilingual Arabic speakers tested in Arabic, Hebrew, and English.
    Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z.
    Neuropsychology; 2009 Mar; 23(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 19254097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords.
    Eviatar Z.
    Neuropsychology; 1999 Oct; 13(4):498-515. PubMed ID: 10527058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An experimental comparison of stimulus type, display type, and input variable contributions to visual field asymmetry.
    Boles DB.
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Mar; 24(2):184-97. PubMed ID: 8185893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The role of Hebrew letter names in early literacy: the case of multiphonemic acrophonic names.
    Levin I.
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Dec; 98(4):193-216. PubMed ID: 17949738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mental rotation differences between Chinese characters and English letters.
    Yan J, Qiu Y, Zhu Y, Tong S.
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul 26; 479(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 20546833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hemispheric asymmetries in reading Korean: task matters.
    Vaid J, Park K.
    Brain Lang; 1997 Jun 01; 58(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 9184098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Stachurski M.
    Cortex; 2009 Apr 01; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.