These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 8043760

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
    van Heesewijk HP, van der Graaf Y, de Valois JC, Vos JA, Feldberg MA.
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Experiences with digital luminescence radiography (DLR) in pediatric radiology].
    Vosshenrich R, Weigel W, Fischer U, Funke M, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1992 Feb; 156(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 1739766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [The lateral thoracic radiograph in the intensive care unit using digital luminescence radiography].
    Witte G, Bause HW, Maas R, Pothman W, Schwermer B, Nicolas V.
    Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):417-20. PubMed ID: 2160101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor and hard-copy.
    Kehler M, Albrechtsson U, Arnadóttir E, Ebbesen A, Hochbergs P, Lundin A, Lyttkens K, Kheddache K, Månsson LG, Angelhed JE.
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Mar; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1562402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Findings of digital intensive or bed lung radiographs at the monitor vs. hard copy: a clinical ROC study].
    Pärtan G, Mosser H, Tekusch A, Urban M, Augustin I, Hruby W.
    Rofo; 1994 Oct; 161(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 7948983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T, Naguib NN, Wutzler S, Bauer RW, Kerl JM, Burkhard T, Schulz B, Larson MC, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ, Balzer JO.
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H, Doi K, Sanada S, Montner SM, Giger ML, Metz CE, Nakamori N, Yin FF, Xu XW, Yonekawa H.
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL, Fuhrman CR, Oliver JH, Britton CA, Campbell WL, Feist JH, Straub WH, Davis PL, Plunkett MB.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M, Prokop M, Thorns E, Oestmann JW, Reichelt S, Haubitz B, Milbradt H, Gräser A, Verner L, Schaefer C.
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.