These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

257 related items for PubMed ID: 8047188

  • 1. Breast cancer screening: recent trends in the use of mammography in Nebraska.
    Rettig B, Nelson N, Faulk R.
    Nebr Med J; 1994 May; 79(5):136-8; discussion 139. PubMed ID: 8047188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Breast cancer screening: recent trends in the use of mammography in Nebraska.
    Rettig B, Nelson N, Faulk R.
    Nebr Med J; 1994 Jul; 79(7):200-3; discussion 204. PubMed ID: 7997309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Breast cancer in Nebraska: recent trends in incidence, mortality, and screening.
    Rettig B, Horton M.
    Nebr Med J; 1996 Mar; 81(3):63-9. PubMed ID: 8907823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Appalachian women.
    Hall HI, Uhler RJ, Coughlin SS, Miller DS.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 11815412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Screening mammography for women 50 years of age and older: practices and trends, 1987.
    Anda RF, Sienko DG, Remington PL, Gentry EM, Marks JS.
    Am J Prev Med; 1990 Jan; 6(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 2397135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999.
    Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ.
    Cancer; 2002 Jun 01; 94(11):2801-12. PubMed ID: 12115366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Self-reported mammography screening among Oklahoma women age 50 and older: Oklahoma Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 1997-2001.
    Campbell J, Bursac Z, Yerkes A, Li P, Baker K.
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2002 Oct 01; 95(10):646-52. PubMed ID: 12420414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Breast cancer screening in Florida. Opportunities for prevention.
    Hopkins RS, Hensley K.
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1993 Mar 01; 80(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 8487025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey.
    Yabroff KR, Breen N, Vernon SW, Meissner HI, Freedman AN, Ballard-Barbash R.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 May 01; 13(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 15159302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prevalence and correlates of breast and cervical cancer screening among older women.
    Ruchlin HS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul 01; 90(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 9207805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Richardson JL, Mondrus GT, Danley K, Deapen D, Mack T.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan 01; 5(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8770470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Factors associated with repeat mammography screening.
    Halabi S, Skinner CS, Samsa GP, Strigo TS, Crawford YS, Rimer BK.
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec 01; 49(12):1104-12. PubMed ID: 11132060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.