These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

161 related items for PubMed ID: 8051270

  • 1. Comparison of agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for determination of ramoplanin MICs.
    Kenny MT, Brackman MA.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1364-5. PubMed ID: 8051270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of protein on ramoplanin broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations.
    Scotti R, Dulworth JK, Kenny MT, Goldstein BP.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Oct; 17(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 8112029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Ramoplanin susceptibility testing criteria.
    Barry AL, Pfaller MA, Fuchs PC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jul; 31(7):1932-5. PubMed ID: 8349779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Activity of retapamulin against Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus evaluated by agar dilution, microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methodologies.
    Pankuch GA, Lin G, Hoellman DB, Good CE, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2006 May; 50(5):1727-30. PubMed ID: 16641442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of the agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for determination of teicoplanin MICs.
    Kenny MT, Dulworth JK, Brackman MA.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1409-10. PubMed ID: 2526821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of agar dilution, broth microdilution, E-test, disk diffusion, and automated Vitek methods for testing susceptibilities of Enterococcus spp. to vancomycin.
    Kohner PC, Patel R, Uhl JR, Garin KM, Hopkins MK, Wegener LT, Cockerill FR.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3258-63. PubMed ID: 9399530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of broth microdilution, agar dilution, and Etest for susceptibility testing of doripenem against gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens.
    Amsler K, Santoro C, Foleno B, Bush K, Flamm R.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Sep; 48(9):3353-7. PubMed ID: 20592149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria.
    Baker CN, Stocker SA, Culver DH, Thornsberry C.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 2037671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of minimum inhibitory concentration results for gepotidacin obtained using agar dilution and broth microdilution methods.
    Arends SJR, Canino MA, Mendes R, Scangarella-Oman NE, Flamm RK.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2020 Oct; 98(2):115107. PubMed ID: 32795850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of broth microdilution, E Test, and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.
    Luber P, Bartelt E, Genschow E, Wagner J, Hahn H.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Mar; 41(3):1062-8. PubMed ID: 12624030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Dalbavancin In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria that Grow Aerobically.
    Koeth LM, DiFranco-Fisher JM, McCurdy S.
    J Vis Exp; 2015 Sep 09; (103):. PubMed ID: 26381422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. In-vitro activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, ramoplanin, MDL 62873 and other agents against staphylococci, enterococci and Clostridium difficile.
    Bartoloni A, Colao MG, Orsi A, Dei R, Giganti E, Parenti F.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1990 Nov 09; 26(5):627-33. PubMed ID: 1688341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Different broth dilution procedures generate different apparent MICs for ramoplanin.
    Bartoloni A, Mantella A, Goldstein BP, Denaro M, Paradisi F.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1994 Jun 09; 33(6):1252-3. PubMed ID: 7928821
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Ramoplanin versus methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: in vitro experience.
    Brumfitt W, Maple PA, Hamilton-Miller JM.
    Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1990 Jun 09; 16(8):377-83. PubMed ID: 2097143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of Clostridium difficile minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution vs broth microdilution methods.
    Hastey CJ, Dale SE, Nary J, Citron D, Law JH, Roe-Carpenter DE, Chesnel L.
    Anaerobe; 2017 Apr 09; 44():73-77. PubMed ID: 28188880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of broth microdilution method using Haemophilus test medium and agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of Eikenella corrodens.
    Alcalá L, García-Garrote F, Cercenado E, Peláez T, Ramos G, Bouza E.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug 09; 36(8):2386-8. PubMed ID: 9666033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of new broth media for microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing of Lactobacilli, Pediococci, Lactococci, and Bifidobacteria.
    Klare I, Konstabel C, Müller-Bertling S, Reissbrodt R, Huys G, Vancanneyt M, Swings J, Goossens H, Witte W.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Dec 09; 71(12):8982-6. PubMed ID: 16332905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of BSAC agar dilution and NCCLS broth microdilution MIC methods for in vitro susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis: the BSAC Respiratory Resistance Surveillance Programme.
    Reynolds R, Shackcloth J, Felmingham D, MacGowan A, BSAC Extended Working Party on Respiratory Resistance Surveillance.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 Dec 09; 52(6):925-30. PubMed ID: 14585864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative in vitro activities of teicoplanin, daptomycin, ramoplanin, vancomycin, and PD127,391 against blood isolates of gram-positive cocci.
    Shonekan D, Mildvan D, Handwerger S.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1992 Jul 09; 36(7):1570-2. PubMed ID: 1324649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of the E test for determining antimicrobial susceptibilities of staphylococci, enterococci, Campylobacter jejuni, and gram-negative bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents.
    Huang MB, Baker CN, Banerjee S, Tenover FC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Dec 09; 30(12):3243-8. PubMed ID: 1452709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.