These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 8054900

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The AMA method of estimation of hearing disability: a validation study.
    Dobie RA.
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):732-40. PubMed ID: 21694598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C, Theo Goverts S, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Audiological evaluation.
    Møller MB.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 11(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 8089203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
    Leensen MC, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram.
    Middelweerd MJ, Festen JM, Plomp R.
    Audiology; 1990 Oct; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2310349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram.
    Bamford JM, Wilson IM, Atkinson D, Bench J.
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Feb; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7214068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
    Sheikh Rashid M, Dreschler WA, de Laat JAPM.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [The systematic selection of speech audiometric procedures].
    Steffens T.
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):219-227. PubMed ID: 27742967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Predicting speech recognition thresholds from pure tone hearing thresholds.
    Coren S, Hakstian AR.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Oct; 79(2):1003-8. PubMed ID: 7870486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S, Brand T, Zokoll MA, Castro FZ, Wardenga N, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Validation of a Self-Administered Audiometry Application: An Equivalence Study.
    Whitton JP, Hancock KE, Shannon JM, Polley DB.
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Oct; 126(10):2382-8. PubMed ID: 27140227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E, Samuelsson E, Danermark B, Rönnberg J.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999 Oct; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Age Dependence of Thresholds for Speech in Noise in Normal-Hearing Adolescents.
    Jacobi I, Sheikh Rashid M, de Laat JAPM, Dreschler WA.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Oct; 21():2331216517743641. PubMed ID: 29212433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T, Wagener KC, Latzel M.
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.