These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


656 related items for PubMed ID: 8068315

  • 1. Suitability of the Vero cell method for titration of diphtheria antitoxin in the United States potency test for diphtheria toxoid.
    Gupta RK, Higham S, Gupta CK, Rost B, Siber GR.
    Biologicals; 1994 Mar; 22(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8068315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of in vitro Vero cell assay and ELISA in the United States potency test of vaccines containing adsorbed diphtheria and tetanus toxoids.
    Gupta RK, Siber GR.
    Dev Biol Stand; 1996 Mar; 86():207-15. PubMed ID: 8785950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Granule-accumulation in VERO cells used for determination of antitoxin titration by micro cell culture method: II. Nature of granules and influence on the potency testing of diphtheria toxoid].
    Yasuda S, Komiya T, Takahashi M, Kameyama S, Matuhashi T.
    Rinsho Byori; 1993 May; 41(5):609-13. PubMed ID: 8350535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative studies of the in vivo toxin neutralization and the in vitro Vero cell assay methods for use in potency testing of diphtheria component in combined vaccines/toxoids. 1: Standardization of a modified Vero cell assay for toxin-antitoxin titration of immunized guinea-pig sera.
    Dular U.
    Biologicals; 1993 Mar; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8217118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Potency assay of diphtheria antitoxin in Vero cell microcultures.
    Sánchez Gómez R, Gallardo y Ramos R, González-Pacheco M.
    Rev Latinoam Microbiol; 1996 Mar; 38(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 8986109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Collaborative study for the validation of serological methods for potency testing of diphtheria toxoid vaccines-part 1.
    Winsnes R, Sesardic D, Daas A, Behr-Gross ME.
    Pharmeuropa Bio; 2004 Jan; 2003(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 14960262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methods for determining unitage of diphtheria antitoxin in adsorbed diphtheria-tetanus (DT) and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccines.
    Shinde YP, Jadhav SS.
    Dev Biol Stand; 1996 Jan; 86():245-60. PubMed ID: 8785954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Quantitation of tetanus and diphtheria antitoxins in mouse sera by indirect haemagglutination.
    Maheshwari SC, Sharma SB, Kumar A, Sokhey J.
    J Commun Dis; 1998 Mar; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 9842161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of toxin neutralisation in test systems for diphtheria antibody assessment.
    Vandenberg J, van der Gun JW, Hendriksen CF.
    Dev Biol Stand; 1999 Mar; 101():105-11. PubMed ID: 10566782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Standardization and validation of Vero cell assay for potency estimation of diphtheria antitoxin serum.
    Kumar S, Kanwar S, Bansal V, Sehgal R.
    Biologicals; 2009 Oct; 37(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 19540135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative analysis of tetanus antitoxin titers of sera from immunized mice and guinea pigs determined by toxin neutralization test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
    Gupta RK, Siber GR.
    Biologicals; 1994 Sep; 22(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 7811454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Collaborative study for the validation of serological methods for potency testing of diphtheria toxoid vaccines - extended study: correlation of serology with in vivo toxin neutralisation.
    Sesardic D, Winsnes R, Rigsby P, Behr-Gross ME.
    Pharmeuropa Bio; 2004 Jan; 2003(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 14960263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. International collaborative studies on potency assays of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids.
    Van Ramshorst JD, Sundaresan TK, Outschoorn AS.
    Bull World Health Organ; 1972 Jan; 46(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 4537488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Determination of low tetanus or diphtheria antitoxin titers in sera by a toxin neutralization assay and a modified toxin-binding inhibition test.
    Sonobe MH, Trezena AG, Guilhen FB, Takano VL, Fratelli F, Sakauchi D, Morais JF, Prado SM, Higashi HG.
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2007 Jan; 40(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 17224998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Development of a guinea-pig model for potency/immunogenicity evaluation of diphtheria, tetanus acellular pertussis (DTaP) and Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide conjugate vaccines.
    Gupta RK, Anderson R, Cecchini D, Rost B, Griffin P, Benscoter K, Xu J, Montanez-Ortiz L, Siber GR.
    Dev Biol Stand; 1996 Jan; 86():283-96. PubMed ID: 8785957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of the indirect haemagglutination test with the toxin neutralization test for the estimation of diphtheria antitoxin in mouse sera.
    Maheshwari SC, Sharma SB, Ahuja S, Saxena SN.
    J Biol Stand; 1987 Oct; 15(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 3680300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A Vero cell method for potency testing of diphtheria vaccines.
    Winsnes R, Sesardic D, Daas A, Rigsby P.
    Dev Biol (Basel); 2002 Oct; 111():141-8. PubMed ID: 12678233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diphtheria antitoxin levels in US blood and plasma donors.
    Gupta RK, Griffin P, Xu J, Rivera R, Thompson C, Siber GR.
    J Infect Dis; 1996 Jun; 173(6):1493-7. PubMed ID: 8648228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Vero cell assay validation of an alternative to the Ph. Eur. diphtheria potency tests.
    Gommer AM.
    Dev Biol Stand; 1996 Jun; 86():217-24. PubMed ID: 8785952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Studies on the correlation of a range of immunoassays for diphtheria antitoxin with the guinea-pig intradermal test.
    Knight PA, Tilleray J, Queminet J.
    Dev Biol Stand; 1986 Jun; 64():25-32. PubMed ID: 3792650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.