These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

191 related items for PubMed ID: 8079849

  • 1. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
    Bree RL, Parisky YR, Bernardino ME, Costello P, Leder R, Brown PC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, Zepp R, Friedman RA, Obuchowski N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
    Small WC, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME, Brummer LT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion.
    Blomley MJ, Coulden R, Bufkin C, Lipton MJ, Dawson P.
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CT.
    Megibow AJ, Jacob G, Heiken JP, Paulson EK, Hopper KD, Sica G, Saini S, Birnbaum BA, Redvanley R, Fishman EK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):583-9. PubMed ID: 11222185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, Peters TL, McGovern PC.
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Peterson JE, Bernardino ME.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
    Jensen LI, Golman K, Nyman U, Dean PB.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material.
    Brink JA, Heiken JP, Forman HP, Sagel SS, Molina PL, Brown PC.
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 7568859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hepatic dynamic sequential CT: section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC, Moyers JH, Chezmar JL, Hoel MJ, Jones EC, Peterson JE, Cork RD, Bernardino ME.
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 1987614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques.
    Schweiger GD, Chang PJ, Brown BP.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1551-8. PubMed ID: 9843287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
    Garcia PA, Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Liang L, Reinhold C, Atri M.
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material.
    Silverman PM, Roberts SC, Ducic I, Tefft MC, Olson MC, Cooper C, Zeman RK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8659426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: effects of bolus tracking and different volumes of contrast material.
    Kopka L, Rodenwaldt J, Fischer U, Mueller DW, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E.
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 8888218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Hepatic enhancement and metastatic lesion conspicuity on CT scans: influence of intravenous glucagon and oral CT contrast material.
    Warshauer DM, Wehmueller MD, Molina PL, Muller KE, DeLuca MC, Lee JK.
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 9015064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.