These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

368 related items for PubMed ID: 8083779

  • 1. Education and counseling for Norplant users.
    Hinkle LT.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1994 Jun; 23(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 8083779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Subdermal contraceptive implants in nurse-midwifery practice.
    Emerling JM, Paluzzi P, Leiva J, Cullins VE.
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1993 Jun; 38(2 Suppl):80S-87S. PubMed ID: 8483013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Levonorgestrel implant use among adolescents.
    Mashburn M.
    J Pediatr Health Care; 1994 Jun; 8(6):255-60. PubMed ID: 7799199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. New concepts in contraception: Norplant subdermal implant.
    Lynn MM, Holdcroft C.
    Nurse Pract; 1992 Mar; 17(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 1565306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Norplant: what health educators need to know.
    Ogletree RJ, Welshimer KJ.
    J Health Educ; 1994 Mar; 25(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 12288963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preliminary experience with Norplant in an inner city population.
    Cullins VE, Blumenthal PD, Remsburg RE, Huggins GR.
    Contraception; 1993 Feb; 47(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 8449019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Innovations in contraception: the Norplant system.
    Klaisle CM, Wysocki S.
    NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992 Feb; 3(2):267-79. PubMed ID: 1596435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H, Dunson TR, Amatya RN, Begum K, Chowdhury T, Dighe N, Krueger SL, Rahman S.
    Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Experience with side effects and health risks associated with Norplant implant use in adolescents.
    Rosenthal SL, Biro FM, Kollar LM, Hillard PJ, Rauh JL.
    Contraception; 1995 Nov; 52(5):283-5. PubMed ID: 8585884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Factors associated with elective Norplant removal in black and white women.
    Opara JU, Ernst FA, Gaskin H, Smith L, Nevels HV.
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1997 Apr; 89(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 9145628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. IMAP statement on Norplant subdermal contraceptive implant system.
    International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP.
    IPPF Med Bull; 1993 Apr; 27(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 12345306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Lee TY, Yang YS, Tseng LH, Ko TM, Hsu MC, Chuang SM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
    Chompootaweep S, Kochagarn E, Sirisumpan S, Tang-usaha J, Theppitaksak B, Dusitsin N.
    Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessing the acceptability of Norplant contraceptive in four patient populations.
    Dugoff L, Jones OW, Allen-Davis J, Hurst BS, Schlaff WD.
    Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8521714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Irregular bleeding, body mass index and coital frequency in Norplant contraceptive users.
    Pasquale SA, Knuppel RA, Owens AG, Bachmann GA.
    Contraception; 1994 Aug; 50(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 7956210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
    Sivin I, Campodonico I, Kiriwat O, Holma P, Diaz S, Wan L, Biswas A, Viegas O, el din Abdalla K, Anant MP, Pavez M, Stern J.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Characteristics and experiences of American women electing for early removal of contraceptive implants.
    Frank ML, Ditmore JR, Ilegbodu AE, Bateman L, Poindexter AN.
    Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7587187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
    Fleming D, Davie J, Glasier A.
    Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.
    Darney PD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. PubMed ID: 8178903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Metabolic parameter, bleeding, and weight changes in U.S. women using progestin only contraceptives.
    Mainwaring R, Hales HA, Stevenson K, Hatasaka HH, Poulson AM, Jones KP, Peterson CM.
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7621683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.