These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 8089391

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A clinical study of patient acceptance and satisfaction of Varilux Plus and Varilux Infinity lenses.
    Cho MH, Barnette CB, Aiken B, Shipp M.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Jun; 62(6):449-53. PubMed ID: 1813540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of Readables to single vision lenses.
    Krefman RA.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Sep; 62(9):676-9. PubMed ID: 1815001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of fitting presbyopic patients with contact lenses.
    Kuhl SA, Henry VA, Bennett ES.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Mar; 63(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 1583278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The optics of occupational progressive lenses.
    Sheedy JE, Hardy RF.
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):432-41. PubMed ID: 16150410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Patient preference for a progressive addition multifocal lens (Varilux2) vs a standard multifocal lens design (ST-25).
    Spaulding DH.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1981 Oct; 52(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 7320370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical comparison of the TruVision Omni and four progressive addition lenses.
    Wittenberg S, Richmond PN, Cohen-Setton J, Winter RR.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 2703652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Subjective evaluation of a new multi-design progressive lens.
    Gresset J.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Sep; 62(9):691-8. PubMed ID: 1815003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Double masked study of progressive addition lenses.
    Borish IM, Hitzeman SA, Brookman KE.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Oct; 51(10):933-43. PubMed ID: 7005296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Anisometropia and presbyopia: prescription of progressive lenses, a new approach].
    Pouliquen de Liniere M, Hervault C, Meillon JP, Rocher P, Coulombel P, Van Effenterre G.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 May; 21(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 9759425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prescribing for the moderate-to-advanced ametropic presbyopic VDT user. A comparison of the Technica Progressive and Datalite CRT trifocal.
    Butzon SP, Eagels SR.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Aug; 68(8):495-502. PubMed ID: 9279049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Compensating presbyopia: a new physiological progressive lens (author's transl)].
    Manent PJ, Pecheur J, Maille M, Claude R.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1981 Aug; 4(11):757-61. PubMed ID: 7328271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical assessment of a customized free-form progressive add lens spectacle.
    Han SC, Graham AD, Lin MC.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Feb; 88(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 21217408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the acceptance of progressive addition multifocal vs. a standard multifocal lens design.
    Hitzeman SA, Myers CO.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Sep; 56(9):706-10. PubMed ID: 4056293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison between anti-reflection-coated and uncoated spectacle lenses for presbyopic highway patrol troopers.
    Bachman WG, Weaver JL.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1999 Feb; 70(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 10457687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.