These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

244 related items for PubMed ID: 8089717

  • 1. Patient classification systems and staffing. Part 1, Problems and promise.
    DeGroot HA.
    J Nurs Adm; 1994 Sep; 24(9):43-51. PubMed ID: 8089717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Patient classification systems and staffing. Part 2, Practice and process.
    DeGroot HA.
    J Nurs Adm; 1994 Oct; 24(10):17-23. PubMed ID: 7931682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Patient classification system evaluation. Part 1: Essential system elements.
    De Groot HA.
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Jun; 19(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 2723792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Acuity systems dialogue and patient classification system essentials.
    Harper K, McCully C.
    Nurs Adm Q; 2007 Jun; 31(4):284-99. PubMed ID: 17909428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validity and reliability of nursing workload measurement systems: strategies for nursing administrators.
    Hernandez CA, O'Brien-Pallas LL.
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1996 Jun; 9(4):33-52. PubMed ID: 9016005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Patient classification system evaluation: Part 2, System selection and implementation.
    De Groot HA.
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Jun; 19(7):24-30. PubMed ID: 2760676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Decision making for nurse staffing: Canadian perspectives.
    Hall LM, Pink L, Lalonde M, Murphy GT, O'Brien-Pallas L, Laschinger HK, Tourangeau A, Besner J, White D, Tregunno D, Thomson D, Peterson J, Seto L, Akeroyd J.
    Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(4):261-9. PubMed ID: 17242391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Measuring nursing intensity in ambulatory care. Part I: Approaches to and uses of patient classification systems.
    Prescott PA, Soeken KL.
    Nurs Econ; 1996 Nov; 14(1):14-21, 33. PubMed ID: 8700244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Nurse staffing and patient safety.
    MacPhee M, Ellis J, Sanchez McCutcheon A.
    Can Nurse; 2006 Oct; 102(8):18-23. PubMed ID: 17094364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Patient classification systems. Nursing workload from the perspective of applied research (part I)].
    Isfort M, Brühl A.
    Pflege Z; 2007 Dec; 60(12):671-5. PubMed ID: 18200983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Nurse staffing levels revisited: a consideration of key issues in nurse staffing levels and skill mix research.
    Flynn M, McKeown M.
    J Nurs Manag; 2009 Sep; 17(6):759-66. PubMed ID: 19694919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessing nursing staffing ratios: variability in workload intensity.
    Upenieks VV, Kotlerman J, Akhavan J, Esser J, Ngo MJ.
    Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 17470768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Nurse requirement planning: a computer-based model.
    Ghosh B, Cruz G.
    J Nurs Manag; 2005 Jul; 13(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 15946176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.