These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


177 related items for PubMed ID: 8092044

  • 1. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB, Dye J, Duval JF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR, Gopalan R, Davidoff AJ, Litt M, Graziano S, Brinker JA.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb 13; 326(7):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
    Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct 13; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S.
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec 13; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Use of low-osmolality contrast media in a price-sensitive environment.
    Steinberg EP, Anderson GF, Powe NR, Sakin JW, Kinnison ML, Neuman P, White RI.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug 13; 151(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 3260719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of low- with high-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Identification of criteria for selective use.
    Matthai WH, Kussmaul WG, Krol J, Goin JE, Schwartz JS, Hirshfeld JW.
    Circulation; 1994 Jan 13; 89(1):291-301. PubMed ID: 8281660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast material for intravenous use in patients perceived to be at high risk: randomized trial.
    Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS, McDonald JR, Hefferton DM, Reddy ER, McManamon PJ.
    Radiology; 1992 Apr 13; 183(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 1549654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Contrast medium-induced adverse reactions: economic outcome.
    Powe NR, Steinberg EP, Erickson JE, Moore RD, Smith CR, White RI, Brinker JA, Fishman EK, Zinreich SJ, Kinnison ML.
    Radiology; 1988 Oct 13; 169(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 3420254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.
    Wolf GL, Arenson RL, Cross AP.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May 13; 152(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 2495706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
    Bree RL, Parisky YR, Bernardino ME, Costello P, Leder R, Brown PC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep 13; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Net costs from three perspectives of using low versus high osmolality contrast medium in diagnostic angiocardiography.
    Powe NR, Davidoff AJ, Moore RD, Brinker JA, Anderson GF, Litt MR, Gopalan R, Graziano SL, Steinberg EP.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jun 13; 21(7):1701-9. PubMed ID: 8496540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.