These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

177 related items for PubMed ID: 8092044

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Nephrotoxicity of high-osmolality versus low-osmolality contrast media: randomized clinical trial.
    Moore RD, Steinberg EP, Powe NR, Brinker JA, Fishman EK, Graziano S, Gopalan R.
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 1535876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Prospective study of adverse reactions to contrast media administered intravenously--a comparison of low-osmolality and high-osmolality contrast media].
    Higashi S, Takizawa K, Suzuki S, Nagashima J, Tamura S, Ishikawa M, Obuchi M, Katayama M.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Nov 25; 48(11):1364-70. PubMed ID: 3237463
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Calculation of internal costs in a department of diagnostic radiology.
    Geitung JT, Göthlin JH, Uhde A, Aslaksen A.
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 Aug 25; 8(3):181-2. PubMed ID: 3139411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis.
    Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr 25; 156(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 1825900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Excretory urography with iohexol: evaluation in children.
    Magill HL, Clarke EA, Fitch SJ, Boulden TF, Ramirez R, Siegle RL, Somes GW.
    Radiology; 1986 Dec 25; 161(3):625-30. PubMed ID: 3786708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
    Koo CW, Shah-Patel LR, Baer JW, Frager DH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May 25; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. CT: considerations for safety, efficiency and cost containment.
    Albertina MJ.
    Radiol Manage; 2002 May 25; 24(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 12422656
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Newer contrast agents for urography.
    Spataro RF.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1984 Jun 25; 22(2):365-80. PubMed ID: 6205415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.