These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


115 related items for PubMed ID: 8099810

  • 1. An in-vitro study of the comparative viability on different swab types of simulated specimens of bacteria commonly present in oro-facial infections.
    Smyth AG, McDowell DB, Stassen LF.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Jun; 31(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 8099810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of bacteriological transport systems.
    Ederer GM, Christian DL.
    Am J Med Technol; 1975 Aug; 41(8):299-306. PubMed ID: 239597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Survival of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria on cotton swabs in three transport systems.
    Yrios JW, Balish E, Helstad A, Field C, Inhorn S.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Feb; 1(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 240870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Swabs and swab-transport media kits in the isolation of upper respiratory bacteria.
    Ross PW, Cumming CG, Lough H.
    J Clin Pathol; 1982 Feb; 35(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 7040485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Improved procedure for transport of dental plaque samples and other clinical specimens containing anaerobic bacteria.
    Spiegel CA, Minah GE, Krywolap GN.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 May; 9(5):637-9. PubMed ID: 39087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Summer mastitis in heifers: a bacteriological examination of secretions from clinical cases of summer mastitis in Denmark.
    Madsen M, Høi Sørensen G, Aalbaek B.
    Vet Microbiol; 1990 May; 22(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 1973009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Anaerobic specimen transport device.
    Wilkins TD, Jimenez-Ulate F.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Nov; 2(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 1104656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of bacterial recovery and viability from three different swab transport systems.
    Tan TY, Ng LS, Sim DM, Cheng Y, Min MO.
    Pathology; 2014 Apr; 46(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 24614721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparative bacteriological studies on summer mastitis in grazing cattle and pyogenes mastitis in stabled cattle in Denmark.
    Madsen M, Aalbaek B, Hansen JW.
    Vet Microbiol; 1992 Jul; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 1355316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reliability of transport medium in the laboratory evaluation of corneal ulcers.
    McLeod SD, Kumar A, Cevallos V, Srinivasan M, Whitcher JP.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 140(6):1027-1031. PubMed ID: 16376646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of three swab transport systems for the maintenance of clinically important bacteria in simulated mono- and polymicrobial samples.
    Tano E, Melhus A.
    APMIS; 2011 Mar; 119(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 21284737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quantitative evaluation of three commercial blood culture media for growth of anaerobic organisms.
    Mangels JI, Lindberg LH, Vosti KL.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jan; 7(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 24059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Liquid based microbiological transport systems: conformity assessment of two commercial devices.
    Avolio M, Camporese A.
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Aug; 115():42-4. PubMed ID: 25957512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.