These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 8103477

  • 1. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
    Chia YT, Arulkumaran S, Yang M.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Jul; 42(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 8103477
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The use of catheter-tip pressure transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Steer PJ, Carter MC, Gordon AJ, Beard RW.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Aug; 85(8):561-6. PubMed ID: 687533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Artifactually elevated basal uterine tonus resulting from measurement of hydrostatic pressure by transducer-tipped intrauterine catheters.
    Ross MG, Walton J.
    J Perinatol; 1994 Aug; 14(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 7830158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluating a new intrauterine pressure catheter.
    Dowdle M.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Aug; 42(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 9284013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor.
    Dowdle MA.
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jul; 48(7):501-5. PubMed ID: 12953323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reliability of intrauterine pressure measurements.
    Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Tien CY, Ratnam SS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):800-2. PubMed ID: 1923200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Intrauterine manometry: reapplication of an old concept.
    Strong TH, Ahn MO, Lipscomb KR, Masaki DI, Greenspoon JS, Paul RH.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1991 Apr; 34(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1674478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The accuracy of catheter-tip pressure transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Ratnam SS, Steer PJ.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Mar; 99(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 1606114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
    Chia YT, Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Ratnam SS.
    J Perinat Med; 1995 Mar; 23(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 8904472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The reliability of catheter-tip transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in the third stage of labour.
    Chua S, Lee M, Vanaja K, Chong YS, Nordstrom L, Arulkumaran S.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Mar; 105(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 9532999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter.
    Vlemminx MWC, Thijssen KMJ, Bajlekov GI, Dieleman JP, Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB, Oei SG.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():197-205. PubMed ID: 28649034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The prediction of "controlled" uterine rupture by the use of intrauterine pressure catheters.
    Devoe LD, Croom CS, Youssef AA, Murray C.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 80(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 1407884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison between fibreoptic and catheter-tip bridge strain gauge transducers for measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Tham KF, Arulkumaran S, Chua S, Anandakumar C, Singh P, Ratnam SS.
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Mar; 17(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 2064594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring].
    Zietek J, Sikora J, Horoba K, Matonia A, Jezewski J, Magnucki J, Kobielska L.
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):791-7. PubMed ID: 19140504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy.
    Buhimschi C, Garfield RE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 174(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 8623816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A new data analyzing tocodynamometer and its suitability for clinical application.
    Furuya H, Hashimoto T, Fukamauchi K, Yoshida K.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Oct; 37(10):2121-9. PubMed ID: 4078411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.